MAINT: drop Python 3.8 support #473
Conversation
.github/workflows/docker-gdal.yml
Outdated
| - "osgeo/gdal:ubuntu-small-3.5.3" # python 3.8.10 | ||
| - "osgeo/gdal:ubuntu-small-3.4.3" # python 3.8.10 | ||
| - "osgeo/gdal:ubuntu-small-3.5.3" # python 3.8.10? | ||
| - "osgeo/gdal:ubuntu-small-3.4.3" # python 3.8.10? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I just pulled osgeo/gdal:ubuntu-small-3.4.3 and osgeo/gdal:ubuntu-small-3.5.3 locally and confirmed they have 3.8.10.
We could use uv's python management to bootstrap Python 3.9 instead of using the system one from GDAL Docker image for these tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I just added the question mark so that I could comment on those lines ;)
I was also thinking doing something similar as we do in the release workflow using uv, but then indeed installing another python version.
Another option would be to use apt to install another python version from the deadsnakes ppa (in other projects we also use that to install a non-system-supported python version in those cases).
Given we already are using uv (also in this workflow), will first give that a go.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One thing I don't understand from the current failure on the docker build is why uv was trying to use Python 3.13.0rc2 for those older images ..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe because it noticed from pyproject.toml that the available python 3.8 would not work for this project?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, @brendan-ward I tried both approaches (for the gdal 3.4 vs 3.5 images), and when using uv to get python 3.9, we still get the same error (that I don't really understand) about "clang" when building pyogrio (for some reason it tries to use clang for building instead of gcc? some consequence of how the python from uv is built?)
When the python is installed with the deadsnakes ppa, it also gets picked up automatically by uv but then building goes fine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(updated to have both use the ppa approach)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for trying it both ways! Not sure why the uv version of python didn't work; it works properly when I try to build within these containers locally (Arm64 containers on MacOS M1 host).
Installing python via deadsnakes ppa is just fine too.
|
@jorisvandenbossche did you want this to go into the upcoming 0.10? It looks very close, and that would be a good time to update required python versions... |
Co-authored-by: Brendan Ward <[email protected]>
|
Yes, I missed your comment, and update this now. Should indeed be ready, and I think good to include in the release. |
No description provided.