Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data set for Russia #4

Open
kiselev-dv opened this issue Jun 8, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Data set for Russia #4

kiselev-dv opened this issue Jun 8, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@kiselev-dv
Copy link

Hi, I have my own geocoder and dataset with ~3000 test cases which was geocoded and checked by hand.

test_uik.json here
https://github.com/kiselev-dv/gazetteer/tree/develop/GazetteerWeb/src/test/resources

There are also some test which can't succeed because there is no corresponding data in OSM, they are marked with skip: true.

@yohanboniface
Copy link
Member

Nice!
Sorry I totally missed this notification (very often with Github) :/

For your information I just moved this repository to https://github.com/geocoders organisation, so we can better collaborate between geocoders (also geocodejson-spec repo). You are welcome to join :)

BTW, have you considered supporting geocodejson-spec in gazetteer?

@kiselev-dv
Copy link
Author

have you considered supporting geocodejson-spec in gazetteer?

I'm thinking about it. It's just not a N1 priority, I still have a lot of thing to improve for fuzzy search.
I also have a dataset with addresses which are actually not in osm and contains a lot of disturbance, so I'm working on to improve G. results for such cases.

But, if there are some common standard for geocoding requests and responses I would eagerly participate in design and implementation.

Could we discuss your proposal via email, or somewhere in wiki?
My email is [email protected]

antoine-de added a commit to antoine-de/geocoder-tester that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants