Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PB-1188: Search preview layer stays on the map #1219

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

sommerfe
Copy link
Contributor

@sommerfe sommerfe commented Jan 22, 2025

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug label Jan 22, 2025
Copy link

cypress bot commented Jan 22, 2025

web-mapviewer    Run #4371

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #4371  •  git commit ee67480970: Merge pull request #1219 from geoadmin/fix-pb-1188-search-preview-layer-stays-on...
Project web-mapviewer
Branch Review develop
Run status status check passed Passed #4371
Run duration 01m 44s
Commit git commit ee67480970: Merge pull request #1219 from geoadmin/fix-pb-1188-search-preview-layer-stays-on...
Committer Felix Sommer
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 1
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 48
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

@sommerfe sommerfe force-pushed the fix-pb-1188-search-preview-layer-stays-on-map branch from a79ba43 to 5fd4976 Compare January 22, 2025 12:43
@sommerfe sommerfe requested review from pakb and ltkum January 22, 2025 12:57
@sommerfe sommerfe marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2025 12:57
@sommerfe sommerfe merged commit ee67480 into develop Jan 23, 2025
6 checks passed
@sommerfe sommerfe deleted the fix-pb-1188-search-preview-layer-stays-on-map branch January 23, 2025 08:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants