Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new children of "cytosolic ribosome assembly" #23886

Closed
ValWood opened this issue Aug 24, 2022 · 8 comments
Closed

new children of "cytosolic ribosome assembly" #23886

ValWood opened this issue Aug 24, 2022 · 8 comments

Comments

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor

ValWood commented Aug 24, 2022

Follow on from
#11517

We should have

cytosolic ribosome small subunit assembly
and
cytosolic ribosome large subunit assembly

underneath cytosolic ribosome assembly

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Aug 31, 2022

I dont find these terms - only

image

so this seems right?

@pgaudet pgaudet closed this as completed Aug 31, 2022
@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Aug 31, 2022

Sorry those were new term requests (not clear). The problem is , because we have these 2 terms:

Screenshot 2022-08-31 at 13 22 51

so unless we have cytosolic equivalents we will not be able to get the resolution between cytosolic and mitochondrial. Note that these term it should be clear that the assembly does not all occur in the cytosol.

I don't think we need equivalent small and large subunit assembly terms for mitochondrial because we don't have such resolution- there seems to be very few papers. I only have 4 genes annotated to mitochondrial ribosome assembly.

@ValWood ValWood reopened this Aug 31, 2022
@ValWood ValWood self-assigned this Nov 3, 2022
@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Oct 4, 2023

Any objection if I add these terms, with do_not_annotate flags for the parents which do not specify mitochondrial or cytosolic?
Or could we rename the term here if it os only used for cytosolic?

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Oct 5, 2023

I dont have strong objections, but I wonder why not use 'occurs in mitochondrion'? or is this a different process?
It would be great to keep MF/BP/CC clearly separated, but I understand in some cases the distinction is important.

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Oct 5, 2023

It's a completely different (but largely unknown) process. I can't see any overlap in the genes involved, but in GO currently they are all lumped in one bag, which is difficult for those studying mitochondrial gene expression.

mitochondrial ribosome assembly has more in common processually with mitochondrial translation than with cytosolic ribosome assembly, so I would like to be able to link these modules

mitochondrial ribosome assembly-> (upstream of) mitochondrial translation
which is difficult to do with extensions (the class will bring in all non mitochondrial assembly)

Note that I see annotations transferred by PAINT from cytosolic ribosomal proteins to mitochondrial ribosomal proteins but these should be removed.

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Oct 9, 2023

ok sound good, please go ahead

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Nov 3, 2023

  1. Added
    +[Term]
    +id: GO:0180023
    +name: cytosolic large ribosomal subunit assembly
    +def: "The aggregation, arrangement and bonding together of a set of components to form a cytosolic large ribosomal subunit." [PMID:30467428]
    +intersection_of: GO:0022607 ! cellular component assembly
    +intersection_of: results_in_assembly_of GO:0022625 ! cytosolic large ribosomal subunit
    +relationship: part_of GO:0042256 ! cytosolic ribosome assembly
    +property_value: creation_dat "2023-11-03T16:06:38Z" xsd:dateTime
    +property_value: term_tracker_item "new children of "cytosolic ribosome assembly" #23886" xsd:anyURI
    +created_by: vw

+[Term]
+id: GO:0180025
+name: cytosolic small ribosomal subunit assembly
+def: "The aggregation, arrangement and bonding together of a set of components to form a cytosolic small ribosomal subunit." [PMID:30467428]
+is_a: GO:0000028 ! ribosomal small subunit assembly
+intersection_of: GO:0022607 ! cellular component assembly
+intersection_of: results_in_assembly_of GO:0022627 ! cytosolic small ribosomal subunit
+relationship: part_of GO:0042256 ! cytosolic ribosome assembly
+property_value: creation_dat "2023-11-03T16:22:03Z" xsd:dateTime
+property_value: term_tracker_item "#23886" xsd:anyURI
+created_by: vw

+[Term]
+id: GO:0180026
+name: mitochondrial small ribosomal subunit assembly
+def: "The aggregation, arrangement and bonding together of a set of components to form a mitochondrial small ribosomal subunit." [] {def="PMID:30467428"}
+is_a: GO:0000028 ! ribosomal small subunit assembly
+intersection_of: GO:0022607 ! cellular component assembly
+intersection_of: results_in_assembly_of GO:0005763 ! mitochondrial small ribosomal subunit
+relationship: part_of GO:0061668 ! mitochondrial ribosome assembly
+property_value: creation_dat "2023-11-03T16:24:18Z" xsd:dateTime
+property_value: term_tracker_item "#23886" xsd:anyURI
+created_by: vw

  1. Addfed logical defs to match existing

  2. Made the parents "do not annotate"
    GO:0000028 ribosomal small subunit assembly
    GO:0000027 ribosomal large subunit assembly
    (this axis of classification could eventually be removed , it is more important to separate cytosolic and mitochondrial gene expression than large and small subunits of different compartments

  3. 90S pre ribosome assembly
    Was part of both large and small ribosome subunit assembly
    Removed and replaced with just "cytosolic..."

  4. made Small-subunit processor assembly
    part of "cytosolic small"

  5. Found GO:1902626 assembly of large subunit precursor of preribosome
    Add missing parent
    part_of "ribosome large subunit assembly"
    (Probably this should be cytosolic?)

not for direct annotation

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Nov 3, 2023

before.
Screenshot 2023-11-03 at 17 05 46

double check after
ribosome_basket.txt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants