Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Upgrade and adapt new WorkerPoolHash function in Gardener v1.98 #318

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Duciwuci
Copy link

How to categorize this PR?

/area dev-productivity
/kind enhancement
/platform equinix-metal

What this PR does / why we need it:

This Pull Requests upgrades the Gardener dependency v1.95 -> v1.98.
This includes also the new WorkerPoolHash function, which now needs an additional variable to be passed.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of gardener/gardener#2590 in Gardener/Gardener.

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Upgrade and adapt new `WorkerPoolHash` function in Gardener `v1.98`.

@Duciwuci Duciwuci requested review from schrodit, jonas-zipprick and a team as code owners July 30, 2024 13:17
@Duciwuci Duciwuci changed the title Upgrade and adapt new WorkerPoolHash function in Gardener v1.98 WIP: Upgrade and adapt new WorkerPoolHash function in Gardener v1.98 Jul 30, 2024
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/dev-productivity Developer productivity related (how to improve development) kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension platform/equinix-metal Equinix Metal platform/infrastructure (previously Packet) labels Jul 30, 2024
@gardener-robot
Copy link

@Duciwuci Thank you for your contribution.

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Jul 30, 2024
@Duciwuci
Copy link
Author

/hold we need more context for adapting the new Workerpoolhash function (see TODO)

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the reviewed/do-not-merge Has no approval for merging as it may break things, be of poor quality or have (ext.) dependencies label Jul 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/dev-productivity Developer productivity related (how to improve development) kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/review Needs review platform/equinix-metal Equinix Metal platform/infrastructure (previously Packet) reviewed/do-not-merge Has no approval for merging as it may break things, be of poor quality or have (ext.) dependencies size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants