Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Respect cloud configuration in dnsrecord #1018

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

kon-angelo
Copy link
Contributor

How to categorize this PR?

/area control-plane
/kind technical-debt
/platform azure

What this PR does / why we need it:
Deprecate DNSRecordConfig. Gardener (and gardenlet at the moment) has no way to pass providerConfig for DNSRecords. The cloud configuration now is coming from the secret similar to how https://github.com/gardener/external-dns-management/tree/master/docs/azure-dns#using-the-service-principal-account mentions.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Deprecate DNSRecordConfig object. Please configure the target Azure management API via the provided secret
Fix an issue where the user DNSRecord could not be created for azure-dns provider on Azure environments other than public.

@kon-angelo kon-angelo requested review from a team as code owners November 19, 2024 15:58
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added kind/api-change API change with impact on API users needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else area/control-plane Control plane related kind/technical-debt Something that is only solved on the surface, but requires more (re)work to be done properly platform/azure Microsoft Azure platform/infrastructure needs/review Needs review size/l Size of pull request is large (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Nov 19, 2024
@kon-angelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test

@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Nov 19, 2024
@testmachinery
Copy link

testmachinery bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Testrun: e2e-l4c7l
Workflow: e2e-l4c7l-wf
Phase: Succeeded

+---------------------+---------------------------+-----------+----------+
|        NAME         |           STEP            |   PHASE   | DURATION |
+---------------------+---------------------------+-----------+----------+
| infrastructure-test | infrastructure-test       | Succeeded | 28m12s   |
| infrastructure-test | infra-flow-test           | Succeeded | 26m14s   |
| infrastructure-test | infra-flow-migration-test | Succeeded | 31m14s   |
| bastion-test        | bastion-test              | Succeeded | 9m49s    |
+---------------------+---------------------------+-----------+----------+

@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Nov 19, 2024
@AndreasBurger AndreasBurger merged commit dd6be7b into gardener:master Nov 20, 2024
19 checks passed
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/control-plane Control plane related kind/api-change API change with impact on API users kind/technical-debt Something that is only solved on the surface, but requires more (re)work to be done properly needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/review Needs review needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else platform/azure Microsoft Azure platform/infrastructure size/l Size of pull request is large (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants