Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate Goldmark Markdown parser #258

Merged

Conversation

dimitar-kostadinov
Copy link
Contributor

@dimitar-kostadinov dimitar-kostadinov commented Dec 8, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:
Integrates ** [goldmark] (https://github.com/yuin/goldmark) ** parser to solve problems with modifying Markdown links:

  • links in HTML comments should not be resolved
  • proper handling of reference links and images
  • links in code blocks & code spans should not be resolved

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #215

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Markdown link processing takes advantage of the CommonMark compliant Goldmark parser and issues with reference links are resolved.

@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 8, 2021
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review size/xl Size of pull request is huge (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else labels Dec 8, 2021
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 15, 2021
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 15, 2021
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 20, 2021
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 20, 2021
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 20, 2021
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 20, 2021
@dimitar-kostadinov dimitar-kostadinov marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2021 13:16
@dimitar-kostadinov dimitar-kostadinov requested a review from a team December 20, 2021 13:16
@dimitar-kostadinov dimitar-kostadinov merged commit 927f3b3 into gardener:master Dec 20, 2021
@dimitar-kostadinov dimitar-kostadinov deleted the goldmark_integration branch December 20, 2021 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/review Needs review needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else size/xl Size of pull request is huge (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Do not resolve commented links
5 participants