Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

- fixed (the straight line program for) a wrong class representative #29

Conversation

ThomasBreuer
Copy link

I have checked that the table of marks of "2.(A4xA4).2.2" is in fact the only one in the library
for which the problem arises that the stored straight line programs are in fact not
class representatives.
For this one table of marks, the proposed change fixes the bug, by replacing one straight line program.
The general code to check this property is in a new test file.
It is called there only for the erroneous table of marks because the runtime is too large for regular automatic tests.

  in the table of marks of "2.(A4xA4).2.2"
- added a general test for nonconjugacy
    TB
@fingolfin
Copy link
Member

See also PR #28 :-)

@fingolfin
Copy link
Member

@gpfeiffer @LiamNaughton it would be really good if you merged either this PR or PR #28 and then made a release. Or, if you are short on time, we are also happy to make that release for you.

If it happens soon, we can get a version of tomlib with this fix into GAP 4.11.

@olexandr-konovalov
Copy link
Member

Added this to gap-system/gap#2984. @LiamNaughton @gpfeiffer this PR is now two months old, could you please let us know what do you think?

@olexandr-konovalov
Copy link
Member

I think this may be closed, as the fix for the same issue was made in #28 and is now in the released version.

@fingolfin fingolfin closed this Feb 15, 2020
@ThomasBreuer ThomasBreuer deleted the TB_correct_representative branch March 14, 2024 14:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants