Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix preparation script for macOS for shell check #79

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

GabLeRoux
Copy link
Member

@GabLeRoux GabLeRoux commented Nov 22, 2024

Replaced if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then with if softwareupdate --install-rosetta --agree-to-license; then in the check_and_install_rosetta function to check the exit status directly.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved error handling and control flow in the environment preparation script.
    • Enhanced readability by removing unnecessary blank lines in functions.
    • Adjusted the export of the LC_ALL variable for consistency.

Replaced `if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then` with `if softwareupdate --install-rosetta --agree-to-license; then` in the `check_and_install_rosetta` function to check the exit status directly.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the prepare-env.sh script focus on enhancing error handling and control flow. The installation process for Rosetta 2 has been simplified by modifying command execution methods. Additionally, unnecessary blank lines have been removed from the resolve_unity_serial and extract_serial_from_license functions to improve readability. A minor formatting adjustment was made by removing a trailing space from the LC_ALL variable export. These modifications aim to refine the script's clarity without introducing new functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/scripts/macos/prepare-env.sh Improved error handling for Rosetta 2 installation; removed blank lines in functions for clarity; adjusted LC_ALL export formatting.

Poem

In the script where bunnies hop,
We’ve tidied up and made it stop,
With clearer paths and fewer lines,
Our code now sings, it brightly shines!
So let us dance and cheer with glee,
For cleaner scripts are fun, you see! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@GabLeRoux
Copy link
Member Author

I probably applied an IDE suggestion a while ago. Pushing it here so that little rabbit can review and suggest changes 🪄

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/scripts/macos/prepare-env.sh (4)

14-14: LGTM! Command status check improvement.

The direct command status check is a better approach than using $?. This change follows shell scripting best practices and eliminates potential race conditions.

Consider capturing error output for better debugging:

-    if softwareupdate --install-rosetta --agree-to-license; then
+    if softwareupdate --install-rosetta --agree-to-license 2> rosetta_error.log; then

91-97: Consider enhancing error messages.

While the blank line removal improves readability, the error messages could be more specific about what exactly failed during serial extraction (e.g., base64 decoding, regex matching, etc.).

Example improvement:

-        printf '%s\n' "Failed to parse the serial from the Unity license."
+        printf '%s\n' "Failed to parse the serial from the Unity license: ${error_step:-Unknown error}"

Line range hint 127-131: Consider improving the license extraction robustness.

The current implementation could benefit from better error handling and more robust string manipulation.

Suggested improvements:

-  encoded_serial="$(cut -c 5- <<< "$developer_data")"
-
-  decoded_unity_serial="$(base64 --decode <<< "$encoded_serial")"
-  readonly decoded_unity_serial
-
-  if [ -n "$decoded_unity_serial" ]; then return 0; else return 1; fi
+  # Skip first 4 characters using parameter expansion instead of cut
+  encoded_serial="${developer_data:4}"
+  
+  if ! decoded_unity_serial="$(base64 --decode <<< "$encoded_serial" 2>/dev/null)"; then
+    printf '%s\n' "Failed to decode base64 serial" >&2
+    return 1
+  fi
+  
+  readonly decoded_unity_serial
+  
+  if [ -z "$decoded_unity_serial" ]; then
+    printf '%s\n' "Decoded serial is empty" >&2
+    return 1
+  fi
+  
+  return 0

Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

Environment variables and dependencies need documentation updates

The script uses several undocumented environment variables and external dependencies:

  • Required environment variables:

    • UNITY_EDITOR_VERSION: Documented in executors but not in the script
    • unity_username, unity_password: Used for Unity activation but undocumented
    • unity_serial or unity_encoded_license: Used for licensing but undocumented
    • BASH_ENV: Used for persisting environment variables
  • Required external commands:

    • System tools: softwareupdate, arch, base64, cut, mkdir, chmod
    • Third-party tools: brew, npm, perl
    • Unity-specific: Unity Hub, Unity Editor
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-167: Verify environment variables and dependencies.

The script relies on several environment variables and external commands that should be documented and verified.

Run this script to check for undocumented environment variables and required commands:


Let me gather more information about the environment variables and their documentation.


Let me check the documentation files for information about the required environment variables.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for environment variables used in the script
echo "Checking for environment variables..."
grep -o '\$[A-Z_][A-Z0-9_]*' src/scripts/macos/prepare-env.sh | sort -u

# Check for external commands
echo -e "\nChecking for required commands..."
commands=(
    "softwareupdate"
    "brew"
    "npm"
    "perl"
    "base64"
    "cut"
    "mkdir"
    "chmod"
)

for cmd in "${commands[@]}"; do
    echo "Command '$cmd' is referenced in the script"
done

Length of output: 1426


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for environment variables documentation in README or docs
echo "Checking documentation for environment variables..."
rg -i "BASH_ENV|UNITY_EDITOR_VERSION" -A 5 -B 5

# Check for additional environment variables used in string comparisons
echo -e "\nChecking for additional environment variables..."
rg '\[ -n "\$\w+" \]' src/scripts/macos/prepare-env.sh

# Check for any setup or documentation files
echo -e "\nChecking for setup documentation..."
fd -t f "README|CONTRIBUTING|SETUP|\.md$|\.env"

Length of output: 4419


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check documentation for environment variables
echo "Checking README.md for environment variables..."
cat README.md

echo -e "\nChecking CONTRIBUTING.md for environment variables..."
cat CONTRIBUTING.md

# Check for any environment variable documentation in the orb source
echo -e "\nChecking for environment variables in orb documentation..."
rg -i "environment|variables" -A 5 -B 5 src/executors/

Length of output: 8912

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1ddf09 and 91b0338.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/scripts/macos/prepare-env.sh (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/scripts/macos/prepare-env.sh (1)

118-118: LGTM! Formatting improvement.

Removed trailing space in LC_ALL export.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant