Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BDRSPS-780 Implemented schema.json and new mutual inclusion check for sensitivity cat and authority #206

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

joecrowleygaia
Copy link
Collaborator

The conservation jurisdiction vocab had a name change from CONSERVATION_JURISDICTION to CONSERVATION_AUTHORITY as part of this.

"required": false
},
"vocabularies": [
"SENSITIVITY_CATEGORY"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this vocab defined somewhere? or is that still in dev?

@Lincoln-GR
Copy link
Contributor

Not a blocking issue, but this is a great example of where I would be happy for the 2 commits to be squashed into 1 so we end up with a cleaner git history.

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
CONCEPT_NAME_CHECK_METHOD = utils.rdf.uri("methods/name-check-method", utils.namespaces.EXAMPLE) # TODO -> Need real URI # noqa: E501
CONCEPT_SEQUENCE = utils.rdf.uri("concept/sequence", utils.namespaces.EXAMPLE) # TODO -> Need real URI
CONCEPT_CONSERVATION_STATUS = rdflib.URIRef("http://linked.data.gov.au/def/tern-cv/1466cc29-350d-4a23-858b-3da653fd24a6") # noqa: E501
CONCEPT_CONSERVATION_JURISDICTION = rdflib.URIRef("http://linked.data.gov.au/def/tern-cv/755b1456-b76f-4d54-8690-10e41e25c5a7") # noqa: E501
CONCEPT_CONSERVATION_AUTHORITY = rdflib.URIRef("http://linked.data.gov.au/def/tern-cv/755b1456-b76f-4d54-8690-10e41e25c5a7") # noqa: E501
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Following the link takes you to a tern page for "conservation status jurisdiction", should we keep this as CONCEPT_CONSERVATION_JURISDICTION? I'm not a SME here

@Lincoln-GR Lincoln-GR merged commit db5c198 into main Sep 17, 2024
5 checks passed
@Lincoln-GR Lincoln-GR deleted the BDRSPS-780 branch September 17, 2024 03:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants