Paket template packagetypes #3212
Conversation
| @@ -163,6 +163,8 @@ LANGUAGE | |||
| en-gb | |||
| tags | |||
| rop, fsharp F# | |||
| packageTypes | |||
| DotnetTool, Template | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we need to normalize user input somehow here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no, i think is better to leave these as is, as normal string list.
nuspec doesnt show an enumeratin of values, is just like a tag about the package type.
Nuget team may have choosen to just use some tag, but instead is another property :( more complexity, few gains
also like that is less maintenance when new types are added. is really a small use case ihmo (template, clitool, dotnetool). and last two is better to be create with dotnet restore probably
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes I'm fine with that (was basically just asking what you think)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, i was thinking about it too, good question.
And to validate it too (to output the right word with the same case as nuget, to play safe).
but use case is really small
add
packageTypestopaket.templateused by newer nuspec schema for types like
Template,DotnetTool,DotnetCliToolis optional, and default is not set