Avoid + in state token, to fix ClassLink #140
Merged
+82
−10
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When the state token is sent to an OAuth2 provider, it undergoes
%-encoding as a URL parameter. Presumably, the OAuth2 provider decodes
it as part of handling things (because it would take work to prevent
their own web frameworks from doing so), and then re-%-encodes it coming
back to us again as a callback parameter.
For us, and all existing providers, + is not a %-encoded character, so
it's sent as-is and sent back as-is. So far so good.
ClassLink, though, chooses to decode + to space. I'm not aware of the
actual spec or if this is a reasonable thing to do, but they do. This
results in them sending %20 back to us, which doesn't match and we fail.
We can't predict or prescribe what providers do in this area, so our
options are:
Look for a match in our Session as-is OR with spaces replaced by +
This is harder than it sounds: a token could contain +'s or spaces,
and we'd be getting back only spaces. To succeed, we'd actually have
to check every permutation of space/+ substitution.
Filter + from our tokens
The only downside is we may generate slightly fewer than 30
characters, and so produce slightly less secure tokens.
I chose this option.
Generate tokens without + to begin with
This would be ideal, but I'm just not familiar enough with
Crypto.Random. I would happily accept a PR to use this option.