Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add cast proof test #6403

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 22, 2023
Merged

Conversation

mattsse
Copy link
Member

@mattsse mattsse commented Nov 22, 2023

@mattsse mattsse force-pushed the matt/add-proof-test branch from 735bc30 to 06f6aa1 Compare November 22, 2023 17:49
@mattsse mattsse changed the title Matt/add proof test test: add cast proof test Nov 22, 2023
@DaniPopes
Copy link
Member

Can you also add 0x1 0x01 or something which is not padded

@mattsse mattsse merged commit 7fcb730 into foundry-rs:master Nov 22, 2023
19 checks passed
Copy link

@excaliborr excaliborr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The thing is the proofs that are generated from 0 and bytes32(0) are not the same, I found this when verifying them against an MPT where the proof from cast proof 0 reverts and cast proof bytes32(0) was a valid proof, thats why I was updating the documentation

@mattsse
Copy link
Member Author

mattsse commented Nov 22, 2023

hmm, odd, as shown here both are parsed the same

@excaliborr
Copy link

excaliborr commented Nov 22, 2023

hmm, odd, as shown here both are parsed the same

Ok so my above comment is wrong, both proofs are the same however the proof I get from my eth_getProof rpc when RLP encoding generates the correct output from an MPT, but the proof from cast proof causes my MPT to revert is there a chance this is a known issue?

@excaliborr
Copy link

Ok I figured it out, it ended up being error in my scripts interacting with cast proof sorry for the confusion

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants