Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Non reactive handling of running state #67

Merged

Conversation

samouwow
Copy link
Contributor

@samouwow samouwow commented Jun 4, 2024

This addresses many of the concerns raised by #65.

It does not attempt to solve any of the "halt" functionality, so reactive sequences and fallbacks are still going to play up a little.

@samouwow
Copy link
Contributor Author

samouwow commented Jun 4, 2024

Main doesn't seem to be building, so I had to branch off HEAD~1.

Would it be possible to revert the latest commit and put it into a feature branch until it's building?

@samouwow
Copy link
Contributor Author

samouwow commented Jun 4, 2024

Also, sorry about all the formatting changes. I ran rust linter and cleared up the cargo warnings on files I touched.

@besok
Copy link
Collaborator

besok commented Jun 4, 2024

yeah, that is fare point. the last commit needs to be pushed to the feature branch

@besok besok merged commit 9ed0b03 into forester-bt:main Jun 4, 2024
@besok
Copy link
Collaborator

besok commented Jun 4, 2024

Thanks for the awesome PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants