-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rule engine obj reloading #2396
Changes from 3 commits
b2442dd
88e2f92
6b92d7f
a07483c
7ad0520
2fae054
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ | |
|
||
import foam.core.*; | ||
import foam.dao.DAO; | ||
import foam.nanos.auth.LastModifiedAware; | ||
import foam.nanos.auth.LastModifiedByAware; | ||
import foam.nanos.logger.Logger; | ||
import foam.nanos.pm.PM; | ||
import foam.nanos.pool.FixedThreadPool; | ||
|
@@ -161,11 +163,17 @@ private void asyncApplyRules(List<Rule> rules, FObject obj, FObject oldObj) { | |
if ( rule.getAsyncAction() != null | ||
&& rule.f(x, obj, oldObj) | ||
) { | ||
// We assume the original object `obj` is stale when running after rules. | ||
// For that, greedy mode is used for object reload. For before rules, | ||
// object reload uses non-greedy mode so that changes on the original | ||
// object will be copied over to the reloaded object. | ||
FObject nu = getDelegate().find_(x, obj); | ||
reloadObject(obj, oldObj, nu, rule.getAfter()); | ||
jlhughes marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
try { | ||
rule.asyncApply(x, obj, oldObj, RuleEngine.this); | ||
saveHistory(rule, obj); | ||
rule.asyncApply(x, nu, oldObj, RuleEngine.this); | ||
saveHistory(rule, nu); | ||
} catch (Exception ex) { | ||
retryAsyncApply(x, rule, obj, oldObj); | ||
retryAsyncApply(x, rule, nu, oldObj); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
@@ -174,7 +182,7 @@ private void asyncApplyRules(List<Rule> rules, FObject obj, FObject oldObj) { | |
|
||
private void retryAsyncApply(X x, Rule rule, FObject obj, FObject oldObj) { | ||
new RetryManager().submit(x, x1 -> { | ||
rule.asyncApply(getX(), obj, oldObj, RuleEngine.this); | ||
rule.asyncApply(x, obj, oldObj, RuleEngine.this); | ||
saveHistory(rule, obj); | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
|
@@ -203,4 +211,62 @@ record = new RuleHistory.Builder(getX()) | |
savedRuleHistory_.put(rule.getId(), | ||
(RuleHistory) ruleHistoryDAO_.put(record).fclone()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Reloads object when running async action since the original object `obj` | ||
* might be stale at the time of execution. | ||
* | ||
* If reloaded object `nu` hasn't changed (reloaded object equals to old | ||
* object) then return the original object as the reloaded object. | ||
* | ||
* If reloaded object has changed and already saved to DAO (reloaded object | ||
* equals to original object) then return the original object. | ||
* | ||
* Otherwise, return the reloaded object. If greedy flag is set to true then | ||
* also copy changes from the original object to the reloaded object. | ||
* | ||
* @param obj - Original object | ||
* @param oldObj - Old object | ||
* @param nu - Reloaded object | ||
* @param greedy - Flag to set greedy mode | ||
*/ | ||
private void reloadObject(FObject obj, FObject oldObj, FObject nu, boolean greedy) { | ||
FObject old = oldObj; | ||
if ( old == null ) { | ||
try { | ||
old = obj.getClass().newInstance(); | ||
} catch (Exception e) { | ||
// Object instantiation should not fail but if it does fail then use the | ||
// original object as the reloaded object. | ||
nu = obj; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
old = old.fclone(); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If you put this line in an else clause for the above 'if' you'll save unnecessary cloneing when you create an object on line 238. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Oh yeah, you're right. |
||
FObject cloned = obj.fclone(); | ||
|
||
// Update lastModified and lastModifiedBy of old and cloned objects so that | ||
// equality comparisons would not be skewed by these properties. | ||
if ( obj instanceof LastModifiedAware ) { | ||
Date lastModified = ((LastModifiedAware) nu).getLastModified(); | ||
((LastModifiedAware) cloned).setLastModified(lastModified); | ||
((LastModifiedAware) old).setLastModified(lastModified); | ||
} | ||
if ( obj instanceof LastModifiedByAware ) { | ||
long lastModifiedBy = ((LastModifiedByAware) nu).getLastModifiedBy(); | ||
((LastModifiedByAware) cloned).setLastModifiedBy(lastModifiedBy); | ||
((LastModifiedByAware) old).setLastModifiedBy(lastModifiedBy); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Use the original object as the reloaded object if nu == old or nu == obj. | ||
if ( nu.equals(old) || nu.equals(cloned) ) { | ||
nu = obj; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// For greedy mode, use the reloaded object (nu) as is. Otherwise, override | ||
// the reloaded object with the changes from the original object. | ||
if ( greedy ) { | ||
nu.copyFrom(obj); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you describe a but that this fixes? If your action is dependent upon whether the object has been written in to the DAO yet or not, then I think we're setting ourselves up for race conditions and your rule would be better of running in an agency at a specific time. Or we should update the async logic to always fetch the latest object from the DAO, what state from the
obj
do you want that won't make it tonu
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have before rules (sync and async) that can update the object by setting its properties. When the next async rule is run the object might not have been saved since saving happen on a separate CMD operation https://github.com/foam-framework/foam2/blob/master/src/foam/nanos/ruler/RulerDAO.js#L208.
As discussed with @kgrgreer, @jlhughes, and @nanoscott, we would have this kind of race condition because there is no synchronization inside the rule engine itself which is something needs to be addressed properly. On the other hand, we would need this temporary fix for our current release to not block the operation team from using IdentityMind integration.
I will be working on creating integration tests for IdentityMind then refactoring the rule engine to support object locking so that reloading would just be a simple
find()
.