Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes issue #52 #63

Conversation

fmalmeida
Copy link
Owner

This is related to issue #52 which raised the attention that some memory values were low, and that it was also required to add a parameter to properly handle high quality long reads a little better.

@fmalmeida fmalmeida added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Feb 12, 2024
@fmalmeida fmalmeida self-assigned this Feb 12, 2024
Copy link
Owner Author

@fmalmeida fmalmeida left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks ok, after reviewing all files
ok = 'changes make sense'

@fmalmeida fmalmeida merged commit 5694080 into dev Feb 16, 2024
3 checks passed
@fmalmeida fmalmeida deleted the 52-incomplete-pipeline-and-different-errors-when-using-nanopore-reads-files-with-different-sizes-900-mb-vs-11gb branch February 16, 2024 14:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant