WIP - Type @task decorator #1372
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Apolinario <[email protected]>
eapolinario
requested review from
wild-endeavor,
kumare3 and
pingsutw
as code owners
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Apolinario <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Apolinario [email protected]
TL;DR
Please replace this text with a description of what this PR accomplishes.
Type
Are all requirements met?
Complete description
This is the original discussion in
mypyabout how to type decorators. Implementing this in@taskdecorator will allow for a tighter feedback loop for users of the Flyte constructs.This should be incorporated only after #1313 is merged.
Tracking Issue
https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/issues/
Follow-up issue
NA
OR
https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/issues/