Added some CICD best practices to the documentation

[Murdock9803]

Tracking issue

Closes #4685

Why are the changes needed?

The documentation at this page talks about Github Actions with CI/CD and Flyte. But, It can be new to many people to work with CICD process and some extra documentation will be helpful.

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In the docs/user_guide/flyte_fundamentals/registering_workflows.md file, which can be seen deployed at this page, I added some documentation related to CI/CD best practices near the end of the file.

How was this patch tested?

The Pull Request is about simple Documentation changes.

Check all the applicable boxes

• I updated the documentation accordingly.
• All new and existing tests passed.
• All commits are signed-off.

Related PRs

Docs link

[welcome]

Thank you for opening this pull request! 🙌

These tips will help get your PR across the finish line:

• Most of the repos have a PR template; if not, fill it out to the best of your knowledge.
• Sign off your commits (Reference: DCO Guide).

[Murdock9803]

@davidmirror-ops @samhita-alla I tried to add the documentation regarding CICD, please have a look at this PR 🙌

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.97%. Comparing base (e0da46b) to head (6df40f0).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5827      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   35.00%   36.97%   +1.96%     
==========================================
  Files        1143     1301     +158     
  Lines      122197   130312    +8115     
==========================================
+ Hits        42777    48182    +5405     
- Misses      75723    77953    +2230     
- Partials     3697     4177     +480     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests-datacatalog	51.58% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteadmin	54.08% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
unittests-flytecopilot	?
unittests-flytectl	62.40% <ø> (?)
unittests-flyteidl	6.92% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteplugins	53.64% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytepropeller	43.02% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytestdlib	55.41% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Murdock9803]

I merged the changes (done by recently merged PRs) into my branch, so this PR does not have any merge conflicts 🙌

[Murdock9803]

@davidmirror-ops The checks have passed, Please have a look at the Documentation and suggest required changes 🙌

[Murdock9803]

@samhita-alla @davidmirror-ops I tried to improve the documentation, Please have a look. As this is a documentation change, I believe continuous feedback and improvement can make for a good article 😄 🙌

[davidmirror-ops]

Left some comments. Thanks!

[Murdock9803]

@davidmirror-ops I removed the unnecessary lines, please suggest further changes If any 🙌
Should I add more info about some particular topics ?

[davidmirror-ops]

Thank you

[Murdock9803]

@davidmirror-ops Thanks for approving the changes ❤️. I have pulled in the latest changes from the main branch into my branch so its up to date 🙌