Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ideal flow for DevOps #2000

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 8, 2022
Merged

ideal flow for DevOps #2000

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 8, 2022

Conversation

samhita-alla
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Samhita Alla [email protected]

I used DevOps but not MLOps because MLOps may mislead users into thinking this is only for ML pipelines.

Fixes #1985

Signed-off-by: Samhita Alla <[email protected]>
@samhita-alla samhita-alla requested a review from kumare3 December 30, 2021 10:16
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
.. _devops-ideal-flow:

Ideal Flow for DevOps
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should not say devops, we can just say how to maintain a good workflow?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now using the title: "How to Streamline Your Flyte Workflows"

rsts/deployment/devops.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rsts/deployment/devops.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rsts/deployment/devops.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rsts/deployment/devops.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rsts/deployment/devops.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kumare3 kumare3 merged commit 35e2616 into master Jan 8, 2022
@kumare3 kumare3 deleted the devops-ideal-flow branch January 8, 2022 18:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Docs] Ideal flow for MLOps
2 participants