Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Add Get matchable attributes to flyte-cli #472

Closed
1 of 13 tasks
katrogan opened this issue Aug 12, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed
1 of 13 tasks

[Feature] Add Get matchable attributes to flyte-cli #472

katrogan opened this issue Aug 12, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@katrogan
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation: Why do you think this is important?
As a platform administrator it can be confusing to get a sense of what matchable attributes (resource quotas, execution queues, etc) are currently applied for specific configurations of domains, projects & workflows.

Goal: What should the final outcome look like, ideally?
It should be easy to get & list matchable attributes within the flyte-cli

Describe alternatives you've considered
Using the GET http endpoint - however since the flyte-cli acts as utility on top of the admin service api it makes sense to continue extending the cli

Flyte component

  • Overall
  • Flyte Setup and Installation scripts
  • Flyte Documentation
  • Flyte communication (slack/email etc)
  • FlytePropeller
  • FlyteIDL (Flyte specification language)
  • Flytekit (Python SDK)
  • FlyteAdmin (Control Plane service)
  • FlytePlugins
  • DataCatalog
  • FlyteStdlib (common libraries)
  • FlyteConsole (UI)
  • Other

[Optional] Propose: Link/Inline
If you have ideas about the implementation please propose the change. If inline keep it short, if larger then you link to an external document.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

Is this a blocker for you to adopt Flyte
N/A

@katrogan katrogan added enhancement New feature or request untriaged This issues has not yet been looked at by the Maintainers labels Aug 12, 2020
@katrogan katrogan removed the untriaged This issues has not yet been looked at by the Maintainers label Aug 17, 2020
@katrogan katrogan self-assigned this Aug 17, 2020
eapolinario pushed a commit to eapolinario/flyte that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2022
* lower mount path

Signed-off-by: Yee Hing Tong <[email protected]>

* test

Signed-off-by: Yee Hing Tong <[email protected]>

* lower case the group also

Signed-off-by: Yee Hing Tong <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Yee Hing Tong <[email protected]>
eapolinario pushed a commit to eapolinario/flyte that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2022
eapolinario pushed a commit to eapolinario/flyte that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2022
Signed-off-by: Flyte-Bot <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: flyte-bot <[email protected]>
eapolinario pushed a commit to eapolinario/flyte that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2023
* lower mount path

Signed-off-by: Yee Hing Tong <[email protected]>

* test

Signed-off-by: Yee Hing Tong <[email protected]>

* lower case the group also

Signed-off-by: Yee Hing Tong <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Yee Hing Tong <[email protected]>
eapolinario pushed a commit to eapolinario/flyte that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant