Fix crash with disabled object storage #3078
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve a simplification of the dependency injection setup for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- cmd/aperture-agent/agent.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/objectstorage/provide.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
pkg/objectstorage/provide.go (2)
25-25: The function signature of
Providehas been changed to returnObjectStorageIfaceinstead of*ObjectStorage. Ensure that all usages of this function are updated to handle the interface type correctly. This change can improve the testability and flexibility of the code by allowing different implementations of theObjectStorageIfaceto be provided.22-28: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [25-50]
The lifecycle hooks for
ObjectStorageare set up within theProvidefunction. Verify that theOnStartandOnStopmethods are correctly implemented for all concrete types that may satisfy theObjectStorageIfaceinterface to ensure proper lifecycle management.cmd/aperture-agent/agent.go (1)
- 47-47: The
fx.Annotateandfx.Asdeclarations forobjectstorage.Providehave been removed. This change simplifies the dependency injection setup but ensure that theObjectStorageIfaceis still correctly injected into the parts of the application that require it.Verification successful
To further verify the correctness of the dependency injection after the removal of
fx.Annotateandfx.As, we should check the dependency injection configuration or the parts of the code whereObjectStorageIfaceis expected to be injected. Let's search for the dependency injection setup or any constructors that might be usingObjectStorageIface.
The search for
fx.Providein conjunction withObjectStorageIfacedid not produce any results. To understand how dependencies are provided, we should perform a broader search forfx.Providewithout filtering forObjectStorageIface. This will help us to identify the dependency injection setup that could involveObjectStorageIface.
The output shows usages of
fx.Providethroughout the codebase, but there is no direct reference toObjectStorageIfacein these calls. To understand howObjectStorageIfaceis provided, especially in the context of the original change, we should examine thefx.Provideusage incmd/aperture-agent/agent.go. Let's look at the specific lines inagent.gowherefx.Provideis used to see if we can find howObjectStorageIfaceis being provided after the changes.
The
fx.Providecall incmd/aperture-agent/agent.goincludesobjectstorage.Provide, which is responsible for providing theObjectStorageIfaceto the application's dependency injection container. This indicates that theObjectStorageIfaceshould still be correctly injected into the application, despite the removal offx.Annotateandfx.As.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of ObjectStorageIface to ensure it's still being injected correctly. rg --type go 'ObjectStorageIface'Length of output: 905
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for dependency injection setup or constructors using ObjectStorageIface rg --type go 'fx.Provide' | rg 'ObjectStorageIface'Length of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any fx.Provide usage to understand how dependencies are provided rg --type go 'fx.Provide'Length of output: 13948
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine the fx.Provide usage in cmd/aperture-agent/agent.go rg --type go --context 5 'fx.Provide' cmd/aperture-agent/agent.goLength of output: 411
Description of change
Fixes: #3077
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
objectstoragemodule to streamline service provisioning.Documentation
objectstorageservice interface.