cron: handle ENOMEM without asserting #5515
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Problem: cronodate_create() calls xzmalloc() which asserts on
ENOMEM, but cronodate is used in a broker module, so asserting is
inappropriate.
Have cronodate_create() call cmalloc() and return NULL on failure.
Ensure the return value is checked all along the call path from the
cron broker module:
cron_entry_create()
-> cron_datetime_create()
-> datetime_entry_from_json()
-> datetime_entry_create()
-> cronodate_create()
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem:
cronodate_create()callsxzmalloc()which asserts on ENOMEM, but cronodate is used in a broker module, so asserting is inappropriate.Have
cronodate_create()callcmalloc()and return NULL on failure. Ensure the return value is checked all along the call path from the cron broker module:(This was peeled off of #5514)