-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 319
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Infra: consider using plugin services to encapsulate IDE-specifc implementations. #61
Comments
FYI @devoncarew --- I think this is a neat (and canonical) way to encapsulate product/IDE-specific implementations. UPDATE: I did some more poking around and feel even stronger that this is the way to go. I'll have a PR out later today with some bones. |
Awesome, thanks for the research! |
More background: the plugin compatibility doc enumerates the modules we can use for our optional includes. |
I think we have a handle on this. (In any event, we're actively considering! ;)) |
As a point of inspiration, we can look to the Go plugin which uses plugin services to separate "SmallIDE" from "Idea" implementations.
This will come in handy in particular for project and module configurations which differ across IDEs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: