Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Infra: consider using plugin services to encapsulate IDE-specifc implementations. #61

Closed
pq opened this issue Aug 24, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@pq
Copy link
Contributor

pq commented Aug 24, 2016

As a point of inspiration, we can look to the Go plugin which uses plugin services to separate "SmallIDE" from "Idea" implementations.

This will come in handy in particular for project and module configurations which differ across IDEs.

@pq pq added the task label Aug 24, 2016
@pq pq self-assigned this Aug 24, 2016
@pq
Copy link
Contributor Author

pq commented Aug 24, 2016

FYI @devoncarew --- I think this is a neat (and canonical) way to encapsulate product/IDE-specific implementations.

UPDATE: I did some more poking around and feel even stronger that this is the way to go. I'll have a PR out later today with some bones.

@devoncarew
Copy link
Member

Awesome, thanks for the research!

@pq
Copy link
Contributor Author

pq commented Aug 24, 2016

More background: the plugin compatibility doc enumerates the modules we can use for our optional includes.

stevemessick added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2016
Mismatched SDK checking and service plumbing (#54,#61).
@pq
Copy link
Contributor Author

pq commented Sep 5, 2016

I think we have a handle on this. (In any event, we're actively considering! ;))

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants