-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
processor: input: output: organize initialization sequence for processor #7396
Merged
leonardo-albertovich
merged 6 commits into
master
from
cosmo0920-organize-initailization-sequence-for-processor
May 17, 2023
Merged
processor: input: output: organize initialization sequence for processor #7396
leonardo-albertovich
merged 6 commits into
master
from
cosmo0920-organize-initailization-sequence-for-processor
May 17, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Hatake <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Hatake <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Hatake <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Hatake <[email protected]>
cosmo0920
changed the title
processor: input: output: organize initailization sequence for processor
processor: input: output: organize initialization sequence for processor
May 16, 2023
leonardo-albertovich
requested changes
May 16, 2023
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Hatake <[email protected]>
cosmo0920
force-pushed
the
cosmo0920-organize-initailization-sequence-for-processor
branch
from
May 16, 2023 08:58
d3ff1fc
to
35db259
Compare
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Hatake <[email protected]>
cosmo0920
force-pushed
the
cosmo0920-organize-initailization-sequence-for-processor
branch
from
May 16, 2023 09:05
1284cb3
to
c8c4905
Compare
leonardo-albertovich
approved these changes
May 16, 2023
leonardo-albertovich
deleted the
cosmo0920-organize-initailization-sequence-for-processor
branch
May 17, 2023 14:23
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In #7071, users reported SEGV when including rewrite_tag plugin within processor stack.
This can be occurred with initialization order for filter plugins on the stack.
All of plugins must be initialized through
flb_engine_start
to initialize event loop and storage and other required instances correctly.This PR fixes the invalid initialization of processor stack which includes rewrite_tag plugin.
Enter
[N/A]
in the box, if an item is not applicable to your change.Testing
Before we can approve your change; please submit the following in a comment:
If this is a change to packaging of containers or native binaries then please confirm it works for all targets.
ok-package-test
label to test for all targets (requires maintainer to do).Documentation
Backporting
Fluent Bit is licensed under Apache 2.0, by submitting this pull request I understand that this code will be released under the terms of that license.