🔧 FIX: v2.5.2 requirements included

[daquinteroflex]

Ahhhhhhhhh this was because I was working back them from the 2.4 defacto develop when I started rather than the pre/2.5 I think since I branched out incorrectly and migrated from there. This is why there is the mismatch in the translation of the requirements to pyproject.toml . I'm just judging by the https://github.com/flexcompute/tidy3d/blob/v2.5.2/requirements/web.txt vs https://github.com/flexcompute/tidy3d/blob/v2.6.0/pyproject.toml

[daquinteroflex]

Note that this PR is correct, it errored because pandas just released a new version 20 mins ago and the new poetry serveer has not fully reconciled with pypi I think. Should involve just running the aciton again.

EDIT: I've only updated the poetry lock up to the required dependencies now, whilst they sort it out.

[momchil-flex]

What is the difference between "^" and ">="?

[daquinteroflex]

It actually has different meanings according to how it is used: https://python-poetry.org/docs/dependency-specification/#caret-requirements

It means the higher minor version for a given major version in this context >=2, <3. Whereas >= just means the highest version from this point >=2 including 3.

[daquinteroflex]

Note that I changed it to match this: https://github.com/flexcompute/tidy3d/blob/v2.5.2/requirements/basic.txt#L10C1-L10C13

since there were no further PRs on that I found and #642

[momchil-flex]

Ok, actually ^ does make a lot of sense, I think we maybe just didn't know about it (or it is not supported in requirements.txt file?). Back when shapely introduced v2, we had something like >= 1.8; <2.0 in the file. So maybe ^ is better now actually? :) This can be done either here or in the 2.7 change...

[tylerflex]

yea probably we should keep the ^, and even apply it to things like numpy, shapely, importlib-metadata.

Maybe best for the 2.7 change (with the less restrictive versions) though?

[daquinteroflex]

Yep that sounds good, will make another PR for 2.7 on this

[tylerflex]

Note: for 2.7 we should also probably relax the requirements for rich, in addition to these ones.