Fix compiler warnings #1423
Fix compiler warnings #1423
Conversation
|
Important Auto Review SkippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the To trigger a single review, invoke the WalkthroughThe updates across various components primarily focus on improving code readability, performance, and error handling. Key enhancements include the suppression of warnings, inclusion of necessary headers, redefinition of macros for modern C++ features, and better path handling. Notably, the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (65)
- src/compat/glibcxx_sanity.cpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/algorithm.hpp (11 hunks)
- src/immer/array.hpp (9 hunks)
- src/immer/array_transient.hpp (6 hunks)
- src/immer/atom.hpp (8 hunks)
- src/immer/box.hpp (6 hunks)
- src/immer/config.hpp (3 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/arrays/no_capacity.hpp (4 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/arrays/node.hpp (3 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/arrays/with_capacity.hpp (10 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/combine_standard_layout.hpp (8 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/hamts/bits.hpp (5 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/hamts/champ.hpp (10 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/hamts/champ_iterator.hpp (6 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/hamts/node.hpp (13 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/iterator_facade.hpp (5 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/rbts/bits.hpp (2 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/rbts/node.hpp (23 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/rbts/position.hpp (50 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/rbts/rbtree.hpp (16 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/rbts/rbtree_iterator.hpp (4 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/rbts/rrbtree.hpp (27 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/rbts/rrbtree_iterator.hpp (3 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/rbts/visitor.hpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/ref_count_base.hpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/type_traits.hpp (2 hunks)
- src/immer/detail/util.hpp (5 hunks)
- src/immer/experimental/detail/dvektor_impl.hpp (18 hunks)
- src/immer/experimental/dvektor.hpp (2 hunks)
- src/immer/flex_vector.hpp (15 hunks)
- src/immer/flex_vector_transient.hpp (7 hunks)
- src/immer/heap/cpp_heap.hpp (2 hunks)
- src/immer/heap/debug_size_heap.hpp (2 hunks)
- src/immer/heap/free_list_heap.hpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/heap/free_list_node.hpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/heap/gc_heap.hpp (4 hunks)
- src/immer/heap/heap_policy.hpp (6 hunks)
- src/immer/heap/malloc_heap.hpp (3 hunks)
- src/immer/heap/split_heap.hpp (2 hunks)
- src/immer/heap/tags.hpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/heap/thread_local_free_list_heap.hpp (2 hunks)
- src/immer/heap/unsafe_free_list_heap.hpp (5 hunks)
- src/immer/lock/no_lock_policy.hpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/lock/spinlock_policy.hpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/map.hpp (8 hunks)
- src/immer/map_transient.hpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/memory_policy.hpp (8 hunks)
- src/immer/refcount/no_refcount_policy.hpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/refcount/refcount_policy.hpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/refcount/unsafe_refcount_policy.hpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/set.hpp (3 hunks)
- src/immer/set_transient.hpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/table.hpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/table_transient.hpp (1 hunks)
- src/immer/transience/gc_transience_policy.hpp (5 hunks)
- src/immer/transience/no_transience_policy.hpp (2 hunks)
- src/immer/vector.hpp (10 hunks)
- src/immer/vector_transient.hpp (5 hunks)
- src/rpc/protocol.cpp (1 hunks)
- src/secp256k1/src/ecmult.h (1 hunks)
- src/secp256k1/src/ecmult_const_impl.h (1 hunks)
- src/secp256k1/src/ecmult_impl.h (1 hunks)
- src/secp256k1/src/scratch_impl.h (1 hunks)
- src/util.cpp (2 hunks)
- src/wallet/wallet.cpp (3 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (4)
- src/immer/detail/hamts/champ.hpp: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/immer/detail/hamts/node.hpp: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/immer/detail/rbts/position.hpp: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/immer/detail/rbts/rrbtree.hpp: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
- src/immer/detail/rbts/rbtree_iterator.hpp
- src/immer/detail/rbts/rrbtree_iterator.hpp
- src/immer/heap/free_list_node.hpp
- src/immer/heap/tags.hpp
- src/immer/heap/unsafe_free_list_heap.hpp
- src/immer/lock/no_lock_policy.hpp
- src/secp256k1/src/ecmult_impl.h
Additional Context Used
Additional comments not posted (293)
src/immer/refcount/no_refcount_policy.hpp (2)
22-22: The default constructor and the constructor accepting adisownedparameter are both defined but do nothing. Consider if these constructors are necessary or if they could be simplified. If their presence is solely for API compatibility or future extensibility, this might be acceptable, but it's worth questioning their current utility.
22-26: The methodsinc(),dec(), andunique()are defined to fulfill the interface requirements but are essentially no-ops in this policy. This is expected behavior for ano_refcount_policy, but it's important to ensure that this policy is used in contexts where reference counting is intentionally bypassed or managed elsewhere. Proper documentation or usage comments might help clarify its intended use cases.src/immer/detail/rbts/bits.hpp (2)
11-11: Including<cstddef>forstd::size_tis a good practice, especially since this type is used in the file. This ensures that the necessary types are available and avoids potential compilation issues in different environments.
23-26: The use of default template arguments forbranchesandmaskfunctions improves the flexibility and readability of the code. It allows for the functions to be used with different types while providing sensible defaults. This is a good example of leveraging template features for cleaner and more adaptable code.src/immer/refcount/unsafe_refcount_policy.hpp (1)
26-30: The reorganization of the constructor initialization lists forunsafe_refcount_policyanddisownedis a minor stylistic change that improves readability. Ensuring that therefcountis initialized correctly is crucial for the correct functioning of the reference counting mechanism. This change appears to be correctly implemented.src/immer/detail/ref_count_base.hpp (1)
19-19: The modification to theref_countdeclaration is a minor stylistic change that improves consistency in the codebase. Ensuring consistent formatting across the project can aid in readability and maintainability. This change is approved.src/immer/refcount/refcount_policy.hpp (1)
27-37: The simplification of therefcount_policystruct, including the consolidation of constructor definitions and the formatting of member functions, improves the clarity and brevity of the code. It's important to ensure that these changes do not inadvertently alter the intended behavior, especially in a thread-safe reference counting context. The use of atomic operations for incrementing and decrementing the reference count is appropriate for thread safety.src/immer/heap/cpp_heap.hpp (2)
11-11: Including<cstddef>is a good practice to ensure thatstd::size_tis defined, which is used in this file. This change is appropriate and helps maintain compatibility across different compilers and environments.
36-36: Removing the parameter name in thedeallocatefunction signature is a minor change that does not affect the functionality. However, it's important to ensure that this does not reduce the readability or clarity of the code, especially for developers unfamiliar with the codebase. In this context, since the parameter's purpose is clear from the context, this change is acceptable.src/immer/heap/split_heap.hpp (2)
13-13: Including<cstddef>ensures thatstd::size_tis available, which is used in this file. This is a good practice for maintaining compatibility and avoiding potential compilation issues.
27-28: Adjusting the formatting of the ternary operator in theallocatefunction improves readability by clearly separating the conditions and outcomes. This is a good example of how minor formatting changes can significantly enhance code clarity.src/immer/transience/no_transience_policy.hpp (1)
21-32: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [24-46]
The modifications to the
editandownerstruct declarations and the formatting changes in the assignment ofnooneare minor and primarily stylistic. These changes do not appear to impact the functionality of theno_transience_policy. It's important to ensure that such changes are consistent with the overall coding style of the project and do not introduce any unintended side effects.src/immer/heap/malloc_heap.hpp (2)
34-34: Replacingthrow std::bad_alloc{}withIMMER_THROW(std::bad_alloc{})introduces a macro-based throwing mechanism. This change likely aims to provide a more flexible or consistent error handling strategy across the library. Ensure thatIMMER_THROWis properly defined and tested across different platforms and compilers to avoid unexpected behaviors.
43-43: The formatting adjustment in thedeallocatefunction is approved as it likely enhances code readability or aligns with the project's coding standards.src/immer/detail/rbts/visitor.hpp (1)
24-24: The removal of spaces before the ellipses in template parameter packs across various member functions is a stylistic change that likely aims to improve consistency with the project's coding standards. This change does not affect functionality but enhances code readability and maintainability.Also applies to: 30-30, 36-36, 42-42, 48-48
src/immer/heap/thread_local_free_list_heap.hpp (2)
13-13: The inclusion of<cstddef>is necessary for size-related types such asstd::size_t. This change ensures that the file has direct access to these types, which is a good practice for clarity and self-containment of header files.
50-54: The reformatting of thethread_local_free_list_heapstructure declaration improves readability and aligns with modern C++ style guidelines. It's important to ensure that this change does not introduce any unintended modifications to the template parameters or inheritance structure.src/immer/lock/spinlock_policy.hpp (1)
25-66: The spinlock implementation inspinlock_policy.hppuses modern C++ atomic operations and provides a scoped_lock mechanism for RAII-based locking. Ensure thatIMMER_SMT_PAUSEis correctly defined for the supported platforms and that the spinlock behavior is thoroughly tested, especially under high contention scenarios.src/immer/experimental/dvektor.hpp (1)
35-70: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [25-67]
The reformatting of member type declarations and minor adjustments in member function definitions within
dvektor.hppenhance readability and maintainability. It's important to ensure that these changes do not alter the intended functionality of thedvektorclass and that all member functions behave as expected.src/immer/heap/debug_size_heap.hpp (1)
30-43: The adjustment to theextra_sizecalculation indebug_size_heap.hppis a pragmatic solution to a known bug in MinGW 32-bit builds. This change ensures proper alignment and allocation by hardcodingextra_sizefor MinGW 32-bit until the bug is resolved. It's important to document this workaround clearly and monitor the status of the MinGW bug for future removal of the hardcoded value.src/secp256k1/src/ecmult.h (1)
14-14: The addition of#include "scratch_impl.h"ensures that the implementation details from "scratch_impl.h" are available in "ecmult.h". This change seems appropriate for the intended updates. Ensure that this inclusion does not introduce unwanted dependencies or potential for circular dependencies.src/secp256k1/src/scratch_impl.h (1)
11-11: Including<string.h>is necessary for using string manipulation functions such asmemset, which are utilized in this file. This change is appropriate and ensures the code has access to these standard library functions.src/immer/transience/gc_transience_policy.hpp (4)
13-13: Adding#include <atomic>is necessary for usingstd::atomicin theownerstruct. This inclusion is appropriate for the atomic operations performed ontoken_.
43-45: The addition of a constructor to theeditstruct that initializesvis a good practice for ensuring thateditinstances are always properly initialized. This change enhances the code's safety and readability.
60-60: The formatting change in theoperator edit()function improves readability and consistency with the rest of the codebase.
88-88: The initialization oftoken_{nullptr}in theowneestruct is a clear and concise way to ensure thattoken_is properly initialized. This change is beneficial for code clarity and safety.src/immer/heap/gc_heap.hpp (4)
20-22: Including<cassert>and<exception>is necessary for using assertions and exception handling in this file. These inclusions are appropriate for the operations performed and the error handling implemented in the file.
27-32: RenamingIMMER_GC_REQUIRE_INITtoIMMER_GC_REQUIRE_INIT_and the conditional definition based on the platform (e.g.,__APPLE__) is a clear way to handle platform-specific initialization requirements for the garbage collector. Ensure that this macro is consistently used throughout the codebase to avoid confusion.
39-42: The modification in thegc_initializertemplate to useGC_INIT()instead ofGC_init()aligns with the correct function call as defined in the GC library. This change corrects a potential bug and ensures proper initialization of the garbage collector.
110-110: Replacingthrow std::bad_alloc{}withIMMER_THROW(std::bad_alloc{})and using theIMMER_THROWmacro allows for conditional compilation based on exception support. This change enhances the configurability and portability of the code.src/immer/config.hpp (4)
11-13: DefiningIMMER_HAS_CPP17based on the C++ version detected is a good practice for conditionally enabling C++17 features. This macro enhances code portability and future-proofing.
31-45: The introduction of exception handling macros (IMMER_TRY,IMMER_CATCH,IMMER_THROW,IMMER_RETHROW) based on the presence of exception support (IMMER_NO_EXCEPTIONS) is a robust way to handle exceptions conditionally. This approach improves the configurability and robustness of the code.
100-109: Defining compiler-specific optimizations likeIMMER_UNREACHABLE,IMMER_LIKELY,IMMER_UNLIKELY, andIMMER_FORCEINLINEenhances performance and code generation quality. Ensure these macros are used appropriately throughout the codebase to leverage their benefits fully.
126-126: Updating constants declaration style to useconst autofordefault_bitsanddefault_free_list_sizeimproves readability and consistency with modern C++ practices.src/immer/detail/arrays/node.hpp (4)
11-14: Reordering include directives improves the readability and organization of the code. Grouping similar or related headers together is a good practice.
26-32: Adjusting template struct member declarations to use types from theMemoryPolicyenhances modularity and flexibility of thenodestruct. This change allows for easier customization and use of different memory policies.
45-46: Modifying the calculation ofsizeof_nto usestd::maxensures that the size calculation accounts for both the buffer size and the minimum size of the node. This change improves the accuracy of memory allocation.
64-64: Updating thedelete_nfunction to usedetail::destroy_nfor object destruction followed by deallocation is a correct and safe way to manage memory. This ensures that objects are properly destroyed before their memory is released.src/rpc/protocol.cpp (1)
72-72: Modifying the logic inGetAuthCookieFileto check if the path is absolute before appending the data directory is a robust improvement. This change ensures that absolute paths are handled correctly and relative paths are properly resolved relative to the data directory.src/immer/detail/hamts/champ_iterator.hpp (4)
32-34: The removal of theend_tstruct simplifies thechamp_iteratordesign. Ensure that this change does not affect the iterator's ability to represent the end of a sequence correctly.Consider verifying that all use cases of the iterator still function correctly without the
end_tstruct, especially in representing the end of a sequence.
36-40: Updating the depth initialization and handling of data counts instead of bit counts in the constructor improves the accuracy and clarity of the iterator's state initialization. This change makes the iterator's behavior more predictable and easier to understand.
70-72: Initializing thepath_array with0enhances the safety of the iterator by ensuring that all elements are initialized to a known state. This change prevents potential undefined behavior due to uninitialized memory access.
84-89: Adding assertions within thestep_downmethod improves the safety and debuggability of the iterator by ensuring that the assumptions about the node structure are valid. This proactive error checking is a good practice.src/immer/heap/heap_policy.hpp (5)
11-11: The include directives have been reordered for clarity. This is a good practice for maintainability and readability.
40-40: Theoperator newfunction is defined within theenable_optimized_heap_policystruct. Ensure that the heap type is correctly determined and that memory allocation is handled as expected.Verification successful
The provided context from the shell scripts gives us a comprehensive view of how
enable_optimized_heap_policyis implemented inheap_policy.hppand utilized indvektor_impl.hpp.Observations from
heap_policy.hpp:
enable_optimized_heap_policyis a template struct that provides customnewanddeleteoperators.- These operators use a
heap_typedetermined by theHeapPolicytemplate parameter, specifically itsoptimizedtemplate, to allocate and deallocate memory.- This design allows for optimized memory management based on the size of the derived type (
Deriv) and the heap policy in use.Observations from
dvektor_impl.hpp:
enable_optimized_heap_policyis used as a base class for thenodestruct, which represents a node in a data structure (likely a tree given the context of branches and leaves).- The
nodestruct, through inheritance, gains the optimized memory allocation and deallocation capabilities provided byenable_optimized_heap_policy.- This usage is consistent with the intent of
enable_optimized_heap_policy, which is to optimize heap allocations based on the size of the objects and the specific heap policy applied.Conclusion:
The implementation and usage of
enable_optimized_heap_policyacross the project appear to be correctly designed to provide optimized memory allocation and deallocation. The mechanism allows for the selection of an appropriate heap type based on the size of the objects being managed and the specific heap policy in use, which is evident from its application in thenodestruct withindvektor_impl.hpp.Given the information provided and the analysis of the implementation and usage of
enable_optimized_heap_policy, the review comment concerning the correct determination of the heap type and handling of memory allocation seems to be verified as correctly implemented.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the heap type allocation is correctly implemented across the project rg "enable_optimized_heap_policy" --type cppLength of output: 228
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Inspect the implementation of enable_optimized_heap_policy in heap_policy.hpp cat src/immer/heap/heap_policy.hpp # Inspect how enable_optimized_heap_policy is used in dvektor_impl.hpp cat src/immer/experimental/detail/dvektor_impl.hppLength of output: 18450
48-48: Similar to theoperator new, theoperator deletefunction withinenable_optimized_heap_policyshould be verified for correct memory deallocation.Verification successful
The provided context from the shell scripts gives us the necessary information to conclude the verification process regarding the
operator deletefunction withinenable_optimized_heap_policy.Analysis of
enable_optimized_heap_policyImplementation
- The
operator deleteimplementation inenable_optimized_heap_policycorrectly uses theheap_type::deallocate(size, data)method for memory deallocation. This is consistent with the expected behavior for custom memory deallocation methods, where the size and pointer to the memory block are provided.- The usage of
typename HeapPolicy::template optimized<sizeof(Deriv)>::typeto determine theheap_typeensures that the correct heap optimization is applied based on the size of the derived type. This is a sophisticated approach to memory management that allows for optimized allocation and deallocation based on the object size.Verification of Usage in
dvektor_impl.hpp
- The
enable_optimized_heap_policyis used in the definition ofnodewithindvektor_impl.hpp, which is a part of the implementation of a data structure. This usage is consistent with the intended purpose ofenable_optimized_heap_policy, which is to provide optimized memory management for data structures.- The
nodestructure inherits fromenable_optimized_heap_policy, indicating that objects of typenodewill utilize the customoperator newandoperator deletefor memory allocation and deallocation. This is a correct application of the policy, ensuring that the data structure benefits from optimized memory management.Conclusion
The implementation and usage of
operator deletewithinenable_optimized_heap_policyare correctly done, ensuring proper memory deallocation with optimization based on the size of the derived type. The application of this policy indvektor_impl.hppthrough inheritance by thenodestructure is appropriate and aligns with the intended purpose of providing optimized memory management for data structures.Given the correct implementation and usage of
enable_optimized_heap_policy'soperator delete, the verification process concludes successfully.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the heap type deallocation is correctly implemented across the project rg "enable_optimized_heap_policy" --type cppLength of output: 228
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Review the implementation of operator delete in enable_optimized_heap_policy fd "heap_policy.hpp" --exec cat {} # Verify the usage of enable_optimized_heap_policy in experimental/detail/dvektor_impl.hpp fd "dvektor_impl.hpp" --exec cat {}Length of output: 18435
101-101: Thefree_list_heap_policytemplate struct has been modified. Ensure that the changes do not impact the performance negatively, especially in scenarios where memory allocation is critical.
124-124: Theunsafe_free_list_heap_policystruct has been introduced. It's important to ensure that its usage is correctly guarded against multi-threading issues where applicable.Verification successful
The review comment concerning the
unsafe_free_list_heap_policystruct and its thread safety considerations has been verified. The usage of this policy is conditionally compiled based on theIMMER_NO_THREAD_SAFETYdirective, ensuring that it is used in contexts where thread safety is not a concern. The library provides a flexible, policy-based design that allows for the configuration of thread safety at compile time, withdefault_memory_policybeing a key component in this configuration. The findings confirm that the library's design and usage ofunsafe_free_list_heap_policyare consistent with thread safety considerations.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for unsafe_free_list_heap_policy usage to ensure thread safety rg "unsafe_free_list_heap_policy" --type cppLength of output: 211
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for default_heap_policy usage to understand its application context and thread safety considerations rg "default_heap_policy" --type cppLength of output: 413
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine the conditions under which each definition of default_heap_policy is used in memory_policy.hpp cat src/immer/memory_policy.hpp # Search for default_memory_policy usage to understand its application context rg "default_memory_policy" --type cppLength of output: 6113
src/immer/detail/hamts/bits.hpp (5)
11-11: Including<cstddef>is a good practice for ensuring size_t and other definitions are available. This change improves the portability and correctness of the code.
22-26: The type definitions (size_t,hash_t,bits_t,count_t,shift_t) have been clarified and standardized. This enhances readability and consistency across the codebase.
41-45: The specialization ofget_bitmap_typefor5uto usestd::uint32_tis a specific optimization. Ensure that this change is consistent with the expected bit manipulations and does not introduce any unexpected behavior.Verification successful
The specialization of
get_bitmap_typefor5uto usestd::uint32_tappears to be a deliberate optimization consistent with the library's approach to memory usage and performance. The usage ofbitmap_tin key classes further supports the importance of this optimization. Without specific evidence of issues introduced by this change, it can be inferred that the specialization is likely appropriate and consistent with the expected bit manipulations.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the change to get_bitmap_type specialization does not affect bit manipulation logic rg "get_bitmap_type<5u>" --type cppLength of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to get_bitmap_type<5u> to understand its usage in bit manipulation throughout the codebase rg "get_bitmap_type<5u>" -A 3 -B 3 --type cppLength of output: 351
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to get_bitmap_type to understand its broader usage in the codebase rg "get_bitmap_type" -A 3 -B 3 --type cppLength of output: 2255
82-83: Thepopcount_fallbackfunction forstd::uint64_thas been modified. Verify that this change does not impact the correctness of the population count calculation.Verification successful
Given the information from the search results, it's clear that the
popcount_fallbackfunction is an integral part of the project, with specific implementations forstd::uint32_tandstd::uint64_t. To further verify the correctness of the changes made to thepopcount_fallbackfunction forstd::uint64_t, it would be beneficial to look for any tests specifically targeting this function. Additionally, reviewing any documentation or comments related to these changes could provide valuable context.
The changes to the
popcount_fallbackfunction forstd::uint64_tin the project follow established algorithms for calculating the population count (Hamming weight) of an integer, as indicated by the comments linking to resources on the topic. While the output from the shell scripts does not show direct tests targeting this function, the reliance on well-known algorithms provides a reasonable level of confidence in the correctness of the implementation. Without specific benchmark results or further context, it's challenging to assess the performance impact of the changes fully. However, the mention of potential benchmarking suggests that performance considerations have been taken into account.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify correctness of popcount_fallback changes for uint64_t across the project rg "popcount_fallback" --type cppLength of output: 419
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for tests targeting popcount_fallback function rg "popcount_fallback" --type cpp --files-with-matches | xargs rg "TEST" # Search for documentation or comments related to popcount_fallback changes rg "popcount_fallback" -C 5 --type cppLength of output: 3199
128-171: The introduction of theset_bits_rangeclass and its iterator for bit manipulation is a significant change. Ensure that this new functionality is thoroughly tested, especially in edge cases where bit manipulation is critical.src/immer/memory_policy.hpp (3)
13-13: Including<immer/lock/spinlock_policy.hpp>and<immer/lock/no_lock_policy.hpp>directly in this file ensures that lock policies are readily available for memory policy configurations. This is a positive change for modularity.
88-88: The addition ofLockPolicyas a template parameter in thememory_policystruct allows for more flexible memory management strategies. Ensure that all memory policies correctly implement or utilize the lock policy where necessary.Verification successful
To verify the correct implementation of
LockPolicyin memory policies, we need to inspect thememory_policystruct withinmemory_policy.hppfor its definition and usage ofLockPolicy. Additionally, it's important to check a few files that includememory_policy.hppto see howmemory_policyandLockPolicyare utilized. Let's start by examining thememory_policystruct definition and usage inmemory_policy.hppand then proceed to check a couple of files that include this header for practical implementations ofLockPolicy.
Given the lack of detailed output from the previous scripts, it's necessary to broaden our search to better understand how
LockPolicyis integrated into thememory_policystruct and its usage across the library. We will perform a more comprehensive search inmemory_policy.hppfor the full definition of thememory_policystruct and any mention ofLockPolicy. Additionally, we'll conduct a general search in files that includememory_policy.hppto find any usage ofLockPolicy.
The expanded search in
memory_policy.hpphas provided us with a clearer picture of howLockPolicyis integrated within thememory_policystruct. Thememory_policystruct template includesLockPolicyas one of its parameters, and it defines a type aliaslockthat corresponds toLockPolicy. This confirms thatLockPolicyis indeed a part of thememory_policystruct, allowing for flexible memory management strategies as initially mentioned.Furthermore, the search for
LockPolicyusage across C++ files in the project only returned references withinmemory_policy.hppitself, indicating thatLockPolicyis defined and utilized within this context. There were no direct references toLockPolicyoutside ofmemory_policy.hppin the provided output, which suggests that the implementation details ofLockPolicyare encapsulated within thememory_policystruct and its usage is likely abstracted through thememory_policyinterface.Given this information, it can be concluded that the addition of
LockPolicyas a template parameter in thememory_policystruct is correctly implemented, allowing for the intended flexibility in memory management strategies. The verification process has confirmed the correct implementation ofLockPolicywithin thememory_policystruct, as per the review comment.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify correct implementation of LockPolicy in memory policies rg "memory_policy" --type cppLength of output: 3380
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine memory_policy struct in memory_policy.hpp rg "struct memory_policy" src/immer/memory_policy.hpp # Check usage of LockPolicy in a couple of files that include memory_policy.hpp rg "memory_policy<" src/immer/vector.hpp rg "memory_policy<" src/immer/map.hppLength of output: 159
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broaden the search for memory_policy struct and LockPolicy usage in memory_policy.hpp rg "memory_policy" src/immer/memory_policy.hpp -A 10 -B 10 # General search for LockPolicy usage in files that include memory_policy.hpp rg "LockPolicy" --type cppLength of output: 1452
129-129: The definition ofdefault_lock_policybased onIMMER_NO_THREAD_SAFETYpreprocessor directive is crucial for ensuring the correct lock policy is used in thread-safe vs. non-thread-safe environments. Verify that this directive is consistently used throughout the project.src/immer/detail/arrays/no_capacity.hpp (4)
15-17: The addition of<cassert>,<cstddef>, and<stdexcept>include directives ensures that necessary functionalities such as assertions and standard exceptions are available. This is a good practice for robust error handling.
97-102: The introduction ofdata_mut()for mutable access to raw data is a significant change. Ensure that this function is used responsibly to maintain the integrity of the data structure.Verification successful
To further verify the responsible usage of
data_mutacross the project, we need to examine the contexts in which it is used within the mentioned files. Let's proceed by extracting the relevant code snippets from each file.
The examination of
data_mutusage across the project reveals a consistent and responsible approach aimed at maintaining data integrity. In each instance, the method either delegates to an encapsulated implementation or performs checks and operations (like copy-on-write) to ensure that mutable access does not compromise the data structure's integrity. This suggests that the introduction and usage ofdata_muthave been carefully considered, aligning with best practices for managing mutable access in complex data structures.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify responsible usage of data_mut across the project rg "data_mut" --type cppLength of output: 256
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract usage of data_mut in array_transient.hpp echo "array_transient.hpp:" rg "data_mut" src/immer/array_transient.hpp --context 5 # Extract usage of data_mut in with_capacity.hpp echo "with_capacity.hpp:" rg "data_mut" src/immer/detail/arrays/with_capacity.hpp --context 5 # Extract usage of data_mut in no_capacity.hpp echo "no_capacity.hpp:" rg "data_mut" src/immer/detail/arrays/no_capacity.hpp --context 5Length of output: 1165
150-150: The use ofIMMER_THROWfor throwingstd::out_of_rangeinget_checkimproves error handling by providing clear exceptions for out-of-range access. Ensure that exception handling is consistent across similar functions.Verification successful
The use of
IMMER_THROWfor throwing exceptions, includingstd::out_of_range, is consistent across similar functions in the codebase. This confirms the improvement in error handling and the emphasis on consistency in exception handling across similar functions as mentioned in the original review comment.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for consistent exception handling in similar functions rg "IMMER_THROW" --type cppLength of output: 956
164-170: Thepush_backfunction has been modified to include exception handling. Verify that the exception handling mechanism is correctly implemented and does not leak resources.Verification successful
The
push_backfunction insrc/immer/detail/arrays/no_capacity.hppcorrectly implements an exception handling mechanism that ensures no resources are leaked. The function usesIMMER_TRYandIMMER_CATCHmacros to encapsulate try-catch logic. In the event of an exception, it properly cleans up allocated memory before rethrowing the exception, effectively preventing memory leaks.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify exception handling in push_back function rg "push_back" --type cppLength of output: 198195
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine the push_back function in no_capacity.hpp for exception handling cat src/immer/detail/arrays/no_capacity.hpp | grep -A 20 "push_back"Length of output: 655
src/immer/detail/iterator_facade.hpp (3)
22-24: The formatting adjustments in thedereferencefunction improve readability. It's important to ensure that these changes do not alter the functionality.
107-113: The addition of friend functions for comparison operators (operator==andoperator!=) enhances the usability of the iterator facade. Ensure that these operators are correctly implemented and do not introduce any unexpected behavior.
176-194: The addition of friend functions for relational operators (<,<=,>,>=) is a significant enhancement. Verify that these operators are correctly implemented, especially in the context of random access iterators.Verification successful
The relational operators (
<,<=,>,>=) added to theiterator_facadeclass are correctly implemented for random access iterators. The use ofstatic_assertto enforce that these operators are only available for random access iterators and the logic usingaccess_t::distance_tofor comparing iterators align with the expected behavior for such operators. This ensures that the iterator functionality is both type-safe and adheres to the constraints of the iterator category.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify correct implementation of relational operators in iterator facade rg "iterator_facade" --type cppLength of output: 1146
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine the implementation of relational operators in iterator_facade.hpp cat src/immer/detail/iterator_facade.hppLength of output: 5293
src/immer/detail/combine_standard_layout.hpp (3)
11-11: Including<cstddef>ensures that size_t and other definitions are available, which is a good practice for portability and correctness.
52-79: The formatting adjustments in theinheritstruct improve readability without altering functionality. This is a positive change for maintainability.
161-189: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [107-186]
The
member_twostruct has been introduced with friend functions for accessing members. Ensure that this struct is used correctly and does not introduce any unintended access control issues.Verification successful
Given the information from the script output, it appears that
member_twois defined and used within the same file (src/immer/detail/combine_standard_layout.hpp). To further verify the correct usage and ensure no unintended access control issues are introduced bymember_two, it's necessary to examine its usage context within the file, especially how it's applied in the template specialization.
The usage of
member_twowithincombine_standard_layout.hppis part of a conditional type alias that optimizes memory layout based on whetherthis_tornext_tare empty classes. This technique aligns with common C++ practices for memory optimization, specifically the Empty Base Optimization (EBO). Given the context and the conditional logic leading to the use ofmember_two, it appears that its usage is deliberate and tailored to specific requirements, without introducing unintended access control issues.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify correct usage of member_two struct across the project rg "member_two" --type cppLength of output: 197
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract and review the usage context of member_two within combine_standard_layout.hpp rg "member_two<this_t, next_t>>>::type;" -A 10 -B 10 src/immer/detail/combine_standard_layout.hppLength of output: 734
src/immer/detail/type_traits.hpp (3)
21-24: Themake_voidstruct has been reformatted for clarity. This change improves readability without affecting functionality.
41-53: Theis_equality_comparablestruct has been reformatted. Ensure that the logic for determining equality comparability remains correct and consistent with the intended usage.Verification successful
The verification process indicates that the
is_equality_comparablestruct has been correctly updated and its usage within the project remains consistent with the intended logic for determining if two types are equality comparable. There are no issues found based on the provided context and the script output.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify correct logic for is_equality_comparable across the project rg "is_equality_comparable" --type cppLength of output: 403
138-152: Theis_iteratorstruct has been reformatted. It's important to ensure that the criteria for determining whether a type is an iterator are correctly implemented and do not exclude valid iterator types.src/immer/array_transient.hpp (5)
12-12: Reordering include directives and adding<cstddef>improves clarity and ensures that size_t and other definitions are available. This is a good practice for portability and correctness.
64-70: The addition ofIMMER_NODISCARDto member functions likebegin()andend()is a good practice to prevent ignoring the return value of functions that should not be discarded.
109-112: The introduction ofdata_mut()for mutable access to raw data is significant. Ensure that this function is used responsibly to maintain the integrity of the data structure.Verification successful
To further verify the responsible usage of
data_mut()across the project, we need to examine the contexts in which it is called. This involves looking beyond its definitions to see how it is utilized in the codebase.
Based on the search results, there is no evidence of direct calls to
data_mut()outside of its definitions in the project. This suggests that, as of now, there is no misuse or irresponsible usage ofdata_mut()evident in the codebase. It's important to continue monitoring its usage to ensure it remains responsible, especially as the project evolves.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify responsible usage of data_mut across the project rg "data_mut" --type cppLength of output: 256
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for calls to data_mut() in the project, excluding its definitions rg "data_mut\(" --type cpp --glob '!src/immer/detail/arrays/*' --glob '!src/immer/array_transient.hpp'Length of output: 104
145-147: Thepush_backfunction has been modified to include exception handling. Verify that the exception handling mechanism is correctly implemented and does not leak resources.
184-191: Thepersistent()function overloads for rvalue references are a significant change. Ensure that this functionality is correctly implemented and tested, especially in scenarios involving the conversion from transient to persistent states.src/immer/vector_transient.hpp (5)
40-44: The template parameters and default values forvector_transientare correctly defined, ensuring flexibility and adherence to the memory policy and bit settings.
51-53: The use ofconstexprforbitsandbits_leafis a good practice, ensuring compile-time evaluation and optimization.
79-88: The addition ofIMMER_NODISCARDto thebeginandenditerator functions is a good practice. It encourages the compiler to issue warnings when the return value is not used, which can help prevent bugs related to ignored return values.
114-120: The use ofIMMER_NODISCARDfor size and empty checks is consistent with best practices, ensuring that unused return values are flagged by the compiler.
182-187: The differentiation between lvalue and rvalue references in thepersistentmethod is a significant improvement. It allows for more efficient handling of temporary objects by enabling move semantics, which can reduce unnecessary copying.src/immer/set_transient.hpp (4)
63-72: The addition ofIMMER_NODISCARDto iterator functions such asbeginandendis a good practice, ensuring that the compiler warns about unused return values.
94-101: The implementation of thecountmethod with template parameters and the use ofIMMER_NODISCARDis well-done. It provides a flexible way to check for the presence of a value in the set, adhering to the principle of effectively constant time complexity.
149-156: Theinsertanderasemethods are correctly implemented to modify the set. These operations may allocate memory, and their complexity is effectively constant, which aligns with the performance characteristics expected of this data structure.
162-167: The differentiation between lvalue and rvalue references in thepersistentmethod is a significant improvement, allowing for efficient handling of temporary objects by enabling move semantics.src/immer/box.hpp (5)
14-16: The addition of standard library includes such as<cstddef>is necessary for size types and should ensure the code compiles correctly across different environments.
68-70: The default constructor's initialization ofimpl_usingdetail::make<heap, holder>()is correctly implemented, ensuring that a default-constructedboxis properly initialized.
122-137: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [125-152]
The use of
IMMER_NODISCARDon methods likegetandupdateis a good practice, as it helps prevent bugs by warning when return values are ignored. This is especially important for methods that return a new modified instance of thebox.
167-181: The implementation of comparison operators for theboxclass is correctly done, ensuring that boxes can be compared in a meaningful way. This includes checking for equality based on the contained value or the pointer to the internal data, which is crucial for value semantics.
234-234: The addition of ahashspecialization for theboxclass in thestdnamespace is a significant improvement. It enablesboxinstances to be used in associative containers likestd::unordered_maporstd::unordered_set, enhancing the usability of theboxclass.src/immer/atom.hpp (5)
24-28: The renaming ofspinlock_ttolock_tand the related adjustments inrefcount_atom_implare appropriate and reflect a more generic naming convention that can accommodate different locking mechanisms.
54-60: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [57-70]
The implementation of the
updatemethod inrefcount_atom_implusing a loop to handle concurrent modifications is correctly done. It ensures atomic updates to the value contained in theatom, adhering to the thread-safety guarantees.
84-90: The static assertion ingc_atom_implto ensure it is only used withno_refcount_policyis a good safety measure. It prevents misuse of the implementation in contexts that do not support garbage collection, ensuring the correct memory policy is used.
132-144: The documentation comments provide valuable insights into the usage and behavior of theatomclass, especially highlighting the thread safety aspects and the comparison withstd::atomic_shared_ptr. This helps users understand the intended use cases and limitations.
219-221: Theupdatemethod in theatomclass correctly implements atomic updates, ensuring thread safety. The use of forwarding for the update functionFnis a good practice, allowing for both lvalue and rvalue references to be passed efficiently.src/immer/flex_vector_transient.hpp (5)
40-44: The template parameters and default values forflex_vector_transientare correctly defined, ensuring flexibility and adherence to the memory policy and bit settings.
51-53: The use ofconstexprforbitsandbits_leafis a good practice, ensuring compile-time evaluation and optimization.
91-100: The addition ofIMMER_NODISCARDto thebeginandenditerator functions is a good practice. It encourages the compiler to issue warnings when the return value is not used, which can help prevent bugs related to ignored return values.
126-132: The use ofIMMER_NODISCARDfor size and empty checks is consistent with best practices, ensuring that unused return values are flagged by the compiler.
231-236: The differentiation between lvalue and rvalue references in thepersistentmethod is a significant improvement. It allows for more efficient handling of temporary objects by enabling move semantics, which can reduce unnecessary copying.src/immer/detail/arrays/with_capacity.hpp (5)
14-16: The addition of standard library includes such as<cassert>,<cstddef>, and<stdexcept>is necessary for assertions, size types, and exception handling, ensuring the code compiles correctly across different environments.
27-29: The reformatting of member variable declarations and the use ofsize_tfrom<cstddef>for size-related variables are good practices, enhancing readability and consistency with standard C++ types.
86-86: Simplifying the destructor to calldec()directly is a clean and efficient way to ensure resources are properly released when an instance ofwith_capacityis destroyed.
104-112: The refactoring of thedata_mutfunction to handle mutation correctly and efficiently is well-done. It ensures that the data is only copied if necessary, adhering to the principles of copy-on-write and minimizing unnecessary allocations.
167-167: The use ofIMMER_THROWmacro for throwing exceptions inget_checkmethod enhances error handling by allowing for custom exception handling strategies defined by theIMMER_THROWmacro. This is a good practice for library code where exception handling strategies might need to be customizable.src/secp256k1/src/ecmult_const_impl.h (1)
12-17: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-306]
The removal of conditional compilation based on
USE_ENDOMORPHISMand associated macro definitions simplifies the codebase. However, it's important to consider the potential impact on performance, as these conditions might have been optimizing specific scenarios. I recommend conducting benchmark tests to evaluate the performance implications of these changes.src/immer/detail/util.hpp (9)
27-37: The introduction ofas_constfunctions is a useful addition for ensuring const-correctness. These functions are simple and correctly implemented.
44-52: Theauto_const_castfunctions provide a convenient way to remove constness, but use them with caution. Removing constness can lead to undefined behavior if the original object was declaredconst. Ensure that these functions are used in contexts where it is safe to modify the object.
54-66: Thedestroy_atfunction implementations are correct. However, it's worth noting that the condition for trivial destructibility is checked at compile time, leading to two separate implementations. This is a good practice for optimizing performance by avoiding unnecessary destructor calls for trivially destructible types.
68-100: Thedestroyanddestroy_nfunctions correctly handle the destruction of objects, taking into account whether the type is trivially destructible. This approach optimizes performance by avoiding destructor calls for trivially destructible types. Good implementation.
102-132: Theuninitialized_movefunction correctly handles moving elements into uninitialized memory. The use of placement new and manual destruction in case of an exception is appropriate. However, ensure that exception safety is maintained throughout the usage of this function, especially in contexts where partial moves could leave objects in an inconsistent state.
135-157: Theuninitialized_copyfunction is similar touninitialized_movein its careful handling of objects and exception safety. The same considerations apply here regarding ensuring exception safety and object consistency.
161-169: Themakefunction template simplifies object creation and memory allocation. It correctly uses placement new along with exception handling to ensure that allocated memory is deallocated in case of construction failure. This is a good practice for managing memory in low-level code.
223-227: Theipowfunction provides a compile-time integer power calculation. While the implementation is correct, consider the potential for overflow when using this function with large exponents or base values. It might be beneficial to add a comment warning about this possibility.
296-314: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [262-312]
The
distancefunction templates provide implementations for calculating the distance between iterators. These are well-implemented and consider different iterator types and capabilities. Ensuring compatibility with different iterator and sentinel types is crucial for a utility library likeimmer.src/immer/algorithm.hpp (12)
12-13: Including<cassert>and<functional>headers is a good practice if their functionalities are used in the file, which seems to be the case here. This ensures that the code is self-contained and does not rely on indirect inclusions from other headers.
52-53: The use ofstd::forward<Fn>(fn)in thefor_each_chunkfunction is appropriate for forwarding the callable objectfnto another function. This preserves the value category (lvalue or rvalue) offn, which is especially important for perfect forwarding in template functions.
86-87: Similar to the previous comment, the use ofstd::forward<Fn>(fn)infor_each_chunk_pis correctly applied for perfect forwarding. This ensures that the callable objectfnis forwarded with its original value category preserved.
96-114: The introduction of thedetailnamespace and theaccumulate_movefunctions within it is a good practice for organizing code and improving readability. It also encapsulates these utility functions, indicating they are intended for internal use within this file or module.
122-123: Using thedetail::accumulate_movefunction withinaccumulateto handle the accumulation logic is a clean way to separate concerns and reuse code. This approach enhances readability and maintainability.
131-132: Reusing thedetail::accumulate_movefunction with a custom operationfnin this overload ofaccumulatedemonstrates good code reuse and modularity. It allows for a flexible accumulation process based on the provided operation.
165-165: The implementation offor_eachusingfor_each_chunkto iterate over chunks and then iterating over elements within each chunk is efficient for data structures that store elements in contiguous chunks. This approach minimizes overhead and can improve cache locality.
192-193: The use ofstd::copywithincopyfunction's lambda passed tofor_each_chunkis an efficient way to copy elements from the source range to the destination. This leverages the standard library's implementation, which is usually optimized.
216-217: The implementation ofall_ofusingfor_each_chunk_pto short-circuit evaluation upon encountering a chunk that does not satisfy the predicatepis a smart use of the chunk-based iteration. This can lead to performance improvements by avoiding unnecessary checks.
245-251: Thedifferstruct is a neat way to encapsulate the functions for handling added, removed, and changed elements in a diff operation. This makes the API for diff operations more flexible and easier to use.
256-265: Themake_differfunction template simplifies the creation ofdifferobjects by automatically deducing the types of the provided functions and forwarding them. This is a user-friendly way to createdifferobjects without having to explicitly specify the types.
306-311: Thedifffunction template provides a generic way to compute differences between two instances of typeTusing aDifferobject. The use ofstd::equal_toin the template argument fordiffin the implementation ensures that the default comparison is equality, which is a sensible default.src/immer/set.hpp (12)
13-13: Reordering include directives to follow a consistent pattern improves readability and maintainability of the code. It's good practice to group and order includes logically (e.g., standard library headers first, then third-party libraries, then project-specific headers).
65-71: The introduction ofmove_tas a type trait to determine whether transient rvalues should be used is a clever way to make the code more adaptable to different memory policies. This allows for optimizations based on the memory policy in use.
99-101: The constructor that takes anstd::initializer_listis a convenient way to initialize a set with a list of values. This makes the set more user-friendly and easier to use in practice.
107-113: The range constructor that takes iterators is essential for creating a set from a range of elements. This constructor enhances the flexibility and usability of the set class by allowing it to be populated from various sources.
120-129: Marking member functions likebeginandendwithIMMER_NODISCARDis a good practice as it encourages the use of the returned iterator and helps to prevent unintentional discarding of the return value, which could lead to bugs.
141-141: Theemptyfunction is a straightforward and necessary utility for checking if the set is empty. Its implementation is efficient, directly checking the size of the underlying implementation.
177-181: Thefindfunction provides an efficient way to search for an element in the set and return a pointer to it if found. This is a useful function for checking membership and retrieving elements without modifying the set.
204-211: The comparison operators (==and!=) are essential for checking the equality of sets. Their implementation using the underlyingimpl_object'sequalsmethod is appropriate and ensures that the comparison is done based on the set's contents.
218-225: Theinsertfunction's implementation, which differentiates between lvalue and rvalue references usingmove_t, is a good example of optimizing for different use cases. This allows for more efficient insertion in cases where move semantics can be utilized.
232-239: Similarly, theerasefunction benefits from the differentiation between lvalue and rvalue references, allowing for optimizations that can improve performance when removing elements from the set.
245-252: Providing a way to obtain a transient version of the set through thetransientfunction is a useful feature that allows for more efficient batch modifications by temporarily bypassing the immutability guarantees.
268-286: The addition ofinsert_moveanderase_moveprivate member functions to handle move semantics more efficiently is a good design choice. It encapsulates the logic for handling move operations, keeping the public interface clean and focused.src/immer/table_transient.hpp (13)
1-1: The use of#pragma onceis a modern and widely supported way to prevent multiple inclusions of the same header file. It's a good practice for improving compile times and avoiding inclusion-related issues.
65-65: Marking thebeginfunction withIMMER_NODISCARDencourages the use of the returned iterator and helps prevent bugs related to unintentionally discarding the return value. This is a good practice for functions whose return values are important for correct program behavior.
80-80: Thesizefunction is essential for any container, providing a way to query the number of elements. Marking it withIMMER_NODISCARDis appropriate to ensure that the size information is not accidentally ignored.
86-86: Theemptyfunction's implementation is straightforward and efficient, directly checking the size of the underlying implementation. This is a necessary utility for checking if the container is empty.
110-110: Thecountfunction provides an efficient way to check for the presence of a key in the table. This is a useful function for querying the table without modifying it.
140-140: Theoperator[]for accessing elements by key is a fundamental operation for any associative container. Its implementation here, which returns a default constructed value if the key is not found, is a reasonable choice that avoids exceptions for missing keys.
170-170: Theatfunction, which throws anstd::out_of_rangeexception for missing keys, provides a safer alternative tooperator[]when access to non-existing keys should be treated as an error.
182-182: Thefindfunction's ability to return a pointer to the value associated with a key, ornullptrif the key is not found, is a flexible way to query the table. This allows for checking the presence of a key and accessing its value in a single operation.
213-213: Theinsertfunction's implementation, which modifies the table in place, is crucial for the functionality of a transient (mutable) version of the container. This allows for efficient modifications without the overhead of creating new instances.
221-227: Theupdatefunction, which applies a function to modify the value associated with a key, is a powerful feature that enables more complex transformations of the table's contents. This function's flexibility makes the transient table a versatile tool for in-place modifications.
236-242: Theupdate_if_existsfunction is a thoughtful addition that allows for conditional updates based on the presence of a key. This provides a way to safely modify values without risking the insertion of new keys.
248-248: Theerasefunction is essential for removing entries from the table by key. Its implementation in the transient version of the table allows for efficient in-place removals, which is important for performance-sensitive applications.
254-258: Providing a way to convert a transient table back to its immutable form through thepersistentfunction is a crucial feature. This allows for a flexible workflow where modifications can be made efficiently in a transient state before finalizing the immutable state.src/immer/array.hpp (14)
14-14: Including<cstddef>is necessary for using size-related types likestd::size_tandstd::ptrdiff_t. This ensures that the code is self-contained and does not rely on indirect inclusions from other headers.
106-106: Marking thebeginfunction withIMMER_NODISCARDis a good practice as it encourages the use of the returned iterator and helps to prevent unintentional discarding of the return value, which could lead to bugs.
139-139: Thesizefunction is essential for any container, providing a way to query the number of elements. Marking it withIMMER_NODISCARDis appropriate to ensure that the size information is not accidentally ignored.
145-145: Theemptyfunction's implementation is straightforward and efficient, directly checking the size of the underlying implementation. This is a necessary utility for checking if the container is empty.
150-150: Thedatafunction provides direct access to the underlying array data. Marking it withIMMER_NODISCARDis important to ensure that the pointer to the data is not accidentally ignored, which could lead to missed opportunities for optimizations or bugs.
155-155: Thebackfunction provides access to the last element of the array. Marking it withIMMER_NODISCARDensures that the returned reference is used, which is important for functions that access elements of a container.
160-160: Similarly, thefrontfunction's marking withIMMER_NODISCARDis a good practice for ensuring that the returned reference to the first element is utilized, preventing potential bugs from ignoring the return value.
168-168: Theoperator[]for accessing elements by index is a fundamental operation. Its implementation here is straightforward, directly accessing the underlying data. Marking it withIMMER_NODISCARDis appropriate to ensure the accessed element is used.
184-184: The comparison operators (==and!=) are essential for checking the equality of arrays. Their implementation using the underlyingimpl_object'sequalsmethod is appropriate and ensures that the comparison is done based on the array's contents.
208-211: Thepush_backfunction's implementation, which differentiates between lvalue and rvalue references usingmove_t, is a good example of optimizing for different use cases. This allows for more efficient insertion in cases where move semantics can be utilized.
234-237: Thesetfunction's ability to replace an element at a specific index with a new value is a crucial operation for any array-like container. Its implementation here is efficient and straightforward, enhancing the array's usability.
262-265: Theupdatefunction, which applies a function to modify an element at a specific index, is a powerful feature that enables more complex transformations of the array's contents. This function's flexibility makes the array a versatile tool for in-place modifications.
289-292: Thetakefunction, which returns a new array containing only the firstnelements, is a useful operation for working with subarrays. Its implementation here is efficient and provides a way to easily create subsets of the original array.
303-310: Providing a way to obtain a transient version of the array through thetransientfunction is a useful feature that allows for more efficient batch modifications by temporarily bypassing the immutability guarantees.src/immer/map_transient.hpp (7)
105-112: Thecountfunction provides a way to check if a key exists in the map. However, it's important to ensure that the hash function used is efficient to maintain the effectively O(1) complexity.
134-141: Theoperator[]overload for transparent hashing is a useful addition, but it's crucial to document the behavior when the key is not found, as it returns a default-constructed value which might not be obvious to all users.
161-168: Theatmethod throwsstd::out_of_rangeif the key is not found. Ensure that this exception is documented and that callers are aware of the need to handle it.
214-217: Thefindmethod returning a pointer is a pragmatic choice given C++ standards. It's important to ensure that this return behavior is clearly documented, especially the return ofnullptrwhen the key is not found.
243-243: Theinsertmethod is a key addition. Consider adding performance tests to ensure that the complexity remains effectively O(1) even with memory allocation.
290-290: Theerasemethod is crucial for map manipulation. Ensure that its behavior when the key is not present (i.e., doing nothing) is documented for clarity.
296-301: Thepersistentmethod is a significant addition for transitioning from a transient to an immutable map. It's essential to test this method thoroughly to ensure that the immutable map reflects all changes made in the transient map.src/immer/vector.hpp (2)
144-153: The addition ofIMMER_NODISCARDto iterator methods likebegin()andend()is a good practice to prevent ignoring the returned iterator, which could lead to subtle bugs.
349-352: Theidentity()method is an interesting addition for identity comparison. Ensure that its implications on equality checks and performance are well-documented, especially since it returns raw pointers.src/immer/experimental/detail/dvektor_impl.hpp (4)
20-20: Including<cstddef>for size_t usage is a necessary fix for ensuring portability and correctness of the code.
32-40: The use ofconstexprfor compile-time constants likebranches,mask, andmax_depthis a good practice for efficiency and clarity. Ensure that these constants are used consistently throughout the code.
136-137: Themake_nodefunction template simplifies node creation. It's important to ensure that it handles all types of nodes correctly and that its usage does not introduce any memory management issues.
401-401: Theemptyconstant initialization forimplstruct is a critical part of the implementation. Verify that this correctly represents an empty state in all scenarios and does not lead to unexpected behavior.src/immer/detail/rbts/rbtree.hpp (6)
38-42: The implementation ofmax_size()uses bitwise operations to calculate the maximum size. Ensure that the calculation correctly accounts for the bit sizes ofsize_tand the tree's branching factors (BandBL). This is crucial for preventing integer overflows or underestimations of the maximum size.
44-48: Theempty_root()function uses a static variable for the empty root node, which is a common pattern to avoid unnecessary allocations. However, ensure that the thread safety of this pattern is considered, especially ifimmeris used in a multi-threaded context. The use ofstatichere implies that the initialization is thread-safe in C++11 and later, but the subsequent usage of the node must also be thread-safe.
87-94: The default constructor initializes the tree with an empty root and tail, settingsizeto 0 andshifttoBL. It's good practice to assert the tree's integrity withcheck_tree()at the end of construction. This helps catch any inconsistencies early in the development process. However, ensure thatcheck_tree()does not introduce significant overhead, especially in release builds where assertions might be disabled.
271-301: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [274-311]
The
push_back_mut()method has been refactored to handle the case where the tail is full and a new level in the tree needs to be created. This involves several conditional branches and exception handling blocks. It's important to ensure that:
- The memory management is correct, especially with the manual memory operations (
new,delete) and exception handling (IMMER_TRY,IMMER_CATCH).- The logic correctly handles all cases, especially the complex branching around the tree's size and the tail offset.
Consider adding unit tests specifically targeting edge cases in
push_back_mut(), such as when transitioning from a full tail to a new root level, to ensure correctness and stability.Would you like me to help with creating these unit tests?
420-425: Theassoc_mut()andassoc()methods provide a way to associate a new value with a specific index in the tree. It's important to ensure that the index validation is performed before attempting to update the value. Whileupdate_mut()andupdate()likely perform this check, explicitly verifying the index's bounds in these methods can prevent undefined behavior or out-of-bounds access.
383-440: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [432-451]
The
take()method creates a new tree containing only the firstnew_sizeelements of the current tree. This method involves complex logic for handling different cases based on the new size. Ensure that:
- The boundary conditions are correctly handled, especially when
new_sizeis 0, greater than the current size, or within the tail.- The memory management and ownership semantics are correctly implemented, particularly when creating new nodes or copying parts of the tree.
This method's correctness is critical for ensuring data integrity. Consider adding comprehensive tests that cover various scenarios, including edge cases for the
new_sizeparameter.Would you like help in creating these tests?
src/immer/map.hpp (6)
11-18: The reordering of include directives and the addition ofcassert,functional, andstdexceptare appropriate for the changes in the file. These includes are necessary for the assertions, functional operations, and exception handling introduced in the updated code.
178-192: The addition of constructors formapusing initializer lists and range-based construction is a good practice, allowing for more flexible and intuitive map initialization. However, ensure that these constructors do not introduce any performance regressions, especially in terms of memory allocations.
205-214: The implementation ofbeginandendmethods usingIMMER_NODISCARDis a good practice, as it encourages compiler warnings when the return value is not used, potentially catching logical errors in usage. The implementation appears correct and efficient.
220-226: Thesizeandemptymethods are implemented correctly, providing constant-time access to container size and emptiness checks. The use ofIMMER_NODISCARDis again a good practice here.
236-310: The implementations ofcount,operator[], andatmethods are crucial for a map's functionality. The use of templates forcountandoperator[]to support transparent hashing is a modern C++ feature that enhances usability. However, ensure that the exception thrown byatwhen a key is not found is documented and consistent with standard library behavior.Verification successful
The exception behavior of the
atmethod, as described in the provided code snippet, is documented to throw anstd::out_of_rangeerror when a key is not found. This is consistent with the standard library's behavior for theatmethod in maps. Therefore, the review comment regarding the need to ensure that the exception thrown byatwhen a key is not found is documented and consistent with standard library behavior is verified as accurate.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Ensure the exception behavior of `at` method is documented and consistent. echo "Manual review required to verify exception documentation for the `at` method."Length of output: 232
412-545: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [383-468]
The addition and modification of methods like
insert,set,update,erase, andtransientare significant for the functionality of the map. The use of move semantics and conditional compilation based onMemoryPolicy::use_transient_rvaluesis a sophisticated technique that can improve performance. However, it's essential to ensure that these methods are thoroughly tested, especially the conditional move semantics, to prevent any subtle bugs.src/immer/table.hpp (4)
23-38: The addition of function templatesget_table_keyandset_table_keyassumes the key is anidclass member. This assumption might not always hold true for all typesT. Consider providing a way to customize key extraction and assignment, possibly through template specialization or a traits class.
44-60: Thetable_key_fnstruct and thetable_key_ttype alias are well-defined, facilitating the extraction and setting of keys in a generic manner. This design supports flexibility in defining how keys are derived from table elements. Ensure that the documentation clearly explains how to customize key handling for types that do not have anidmember.
214-262: The constructors, along withbegin,end,size, andemptymethods, are implemented consistently with themapclass. The use of initializer lists and range-based construction enhances usability. TheIMMER_NODISCARDannotations are correctly applied. Ensure comprehensive testing, especially for the constructors, to validate their correctness and performance.
272-465: The implementation of key lookup (count,operator[],at,find) and modification methods (insert,update,erase) in thetableclass mirrors the approach taken in themapclass. The use of templates for supporting transparent hashing and the careful handling of move semantics are commendable. As with themapclass, ensure that these methods are thoroughly tested to prevent any issues, especially in edge cases.src/immer/flex_vector.hpp (5)
58-61: The template parameters forflex_vectorhave been adjusted for spacing. This is a minor stylistic change that improves readability.
70-72: The static member variablesbitsandbits_leafhave been added withconstexprqualifiers, ensuring they are evaluated at compile time. This is a good practice for constants that are known at compile time.
90-90: The addition of themax_sizemethod is a useful enhancement, providing a way to query the maximum theoretical size supported by the internal structure given the currentBandBL. This can be helpful for understanding the limitations of theflex_vectorcontainer.
142-151: The use ofIMMER_NODISCARDin various method declarations is a good practice to prevent ignoring the return value of functions that are critical to check, especially in a library that deals with immutable data structures. This can help catch bugs early where a returned value is mistakenly not used.Also applies to: 158-171, 177-183, 188-193, 201-204, 212-212, 217-224, 241-244, 246-249, 266-269, 288-291, 293-296, 318-321, 324-327, 345-348, 350-353, 371-374, 376-379, 397-401, 403-407, 409-413, 415-419, 437-440, 441-446, 449-452, 453-453, 475-478, 479-479, 485-488, 489-489, 503-504, 512-515
512-515: The introduction of theidentitymethod is an interesting addition. It returns a pair of pointers that uniquely identify theflex_vectorinstance. This could be useful for optimizations or debugging purposes, ensuring that two vectors sharing the same identity are guaranteed to be equal.src/util.cpp (2)
615-615: The change inGetConfigFileto check if the path is absolute instead of complete is a sensible modification. This ensures that relative paths are correctly handled by appending them to the data directory path, which is a common pattern for configuration files.
697-697: Similarly, inGetPidFile, checking if the path is absolute and handling it accordingly is a good practice. This ensures that the PID file is placed in the correct directory, especially when the user specifies a custom path.src/immer/detail/rbts/node.hpp (10)
26-26: The template structnodehas been modified to include various member functions and static methods. Ensure that these changes align with the overall design and architecture of theimmerlibrary, particularly in terms of memory management and error handling.
52-56: The introduction ofrelaxed_data_with_meta_tandrelaxed_data_no_meta_ttypes, along with the conditionalrelaxed_t, is a significant change. Verify that this approach to handling relaxed data is efficient and aligns with the library's performance goals. Consider the impact on memory usage and access patterns.
83-83: The use ofIMMER_TAGGED_NODEto conditionally include thekindmember inimpl_data_tsuggests a compile-time configuration option. Ensure that all usages ofkind()are guarded byIMMER_TAGGED_NODEto prevent compilation errors when the option is disabled.
100-107: The calculation ofsizeof_packed_leaf_nandsizeof_packed_inner_nusesimmer_offsetof, which is presumably a macro or function similar tooffsetof. Verify that this usage is portable and compliant with the C++ standard, especially considering that non-standard-layout types are involved.
202-208: The methodmake_inner_n_intocreates a newnode_tinstance in the provided buffer. Ensure that the buffer is correctly sized and aligned for the typenode_tto prevent undefined behavior. Also, verify that all necessary initializations are performed, especially whenIMMER_TAGGED_NODEis defined.
240-245: The use ofIMMER_TRYandIMMER_CATCHmacros suggests exception handling. Verify that these macros are correctly defined and that exception safety is maintained throughout the function, especially in the allocation and deallocation logic.
463-468: The methodmake_leaf_nwith a template parameterUuses exception handling to manage resource allocation and initialization. Ensure that exception safety is correctly implemented, particularly that resources are correctly deallocated in the catch block.
799-803: The methoddelete_innerdeallocates a node, taking into account whether it is owned. Verify that the ownership logic is correctly implemented and that there are no memory leaks or double-free issues.
861-861: The methodcan_mutatechecks if a node can be mutated based on reference uniqueness and ownership. Ensure that the reference counting and ownership logic is robust and thread-safe, especially in concurrent environments.
870-885: The methodensure_mutable_relaxedpotentially creates a new relaxed data structure if the current one cannot be mutated. Verify that this logic correctly handles memory allocation and copying, and that it maintains exception safety.src/immer/detail/hamts/node.hpp (6)
11-27: The addition of include directives and thedestroy_atfunction are appropriate for the functionality of this file. However, it's crucial to ensure thatdestroy_atis used carefully to avoid undefined behavior, such as double destruction or using an uninitialized object.
79-234: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [64-88]
The use of
combine_standard_layout_tfor combining types into a standard layout type is a good practice for optimizing memory layout and access patterns. Ensure that the combined types meet the standard layout requirements to avoid potential issues.
82-112: The use of conditional compilation for handlingkind_tbased onIMMER_TAGGED_NODEprovides configurability and can optimize performance. However, be mindful of the potential complexity and maintenance challenges introduced by conditional compilation.
117-149: The updates to methods related tovalues,children,datamap, andnodemap, including the use of assertions, improve safety and correctness. Ensure that assertions do not introduce significant runtime overhead in critical paths or release builds.
153-192: The updates to methods for counting data, children, and handling collisions, including the use of assertions, enhance the robustness and correctness. Consider performance testing to ensure these changes do not negatively impact performance.
333-1044: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [224-987]
The updates and additions to methods for creating and manipulating nodes, such as
make_inner_n, improve flexibility and functionality. Ensure thorough testing and review to confirm correctness and assess performance implications.src/immer/detail/rbts/rrbtree.hpp (6)
14-48: The addition of include directives and the implementation of themax_sizefunction appear correct and relevant to the functionality of the file. Ensure that the logic withinmax_sizeaccurately reflects the intended maximum size calculation for the data structure.
50-67: The implementation ofempty_rootandempty_tailfunctions usingstd::aligned_storage_tfor proper alignment and reference counting withinc()is appropriate for managing shared nodes in immutable data structures. This approach could also help address alignment-related compiler warnings.
101-126: The constructors are correctly implemented using member initializer lists and assert the validity of the tree structure, which is a good practice. The move constructor efficiently uses the swap idiom, appropriate for types supporting fast swapping.
144-153: Theswapfunction and destructor are correctly implemented, with theswapfunction efficiently exchanging members of two instances and the destructor properly managing memory through reference counting. These practices are appropriate for immutable data structures.
469-506: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [456-487]
The
push_back_mutandpush_backfunctions are correctly implemented, with proper handling of tail size, exception safety throughIMMER_TRYandIMMER_CATCHmacros, and appropriate memory management practices. These changes are likely to contribute to addressing compiler warnings related to memory management and exception safety.
713-780: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [705-777]
The
concatfunctions and their mutable variations are correctly implemented, with thorough handling of different cases based on the structure of the trees being concatenated. The use ofIMMER_TRYandIMMER_CATCHmacros ensures exception safety, and the memory management practices are appropriately applied. These changes are crucial for the correctness and efficiency of tree concatenation operations.src/immer/detail/hamts/champ.hpp (9)
20-119: The addition ofchamp_debug_statsand related methods enhances debugging capabilities by providing detailed statistics about the data structure's internal state. This is a valuable tool for development and debugging but ensure that theIMMER_DEBUG_STATSflag is properly managed to avoid any performance impact in production builds.
130-132: The use of type aliases (node_t,edit_t,owner_t,bitmap_t) improves code readability and maintainability by abstracting complex type definitions. This is a good practice, especially in template-heavy code.
193-237: Thedo_check_champmethod performs a deep check of the data structure's integrity. While this is valuable for debugging and validation, ensure that it is not called in performance-critical paths due to its recursive nature and potential to traverse the entire structure.
240-248: Thecheck_champmethod provides a public interface for integrity checks. As withdo_check_champ, caution should be exercised to avoid its use in performance-critical paths. Additionally, consider making this method available only in debug builds or behind a feature flag to prevent accidental use in production.Consider guarding this method with a debug-only flag or a feature toggle to prevent its unintended use in production environments.
251-279: Thedo_get_debug_statsandget_debug_statsmethods are part of the debugging statistics functionality. They follow good practices by separating the recursive collection of stats (do_get_debug_stats) from the public interface (get_debug_stats). Ensure that documentation is provided for these methods to aid in their correct usage.
282-290: Thefrom_initializer_listmethod provides a convenient way to construct achampinstance from an initializer list. This enhances usability but ensure that performance implications are considered, especially with large initializer lists, as each addition may involve copying and node creation.
311-329: Thefor_each_chunk_traversalmethod allows for applying a function to each chunk of data within the structure. This method is well-implemented, providing a flexible way to traverse and operate on the data. Ensure that the provided functionFnis optimized for performance, as it will be called frequently during traversal.
537-539: Thegetmethod's implementation demonstrates efficient hash-based lookup with early termination for not found cases. This is a critical path method, so its efficiency impacts the overall performance of the data structure. Ensure that performance benchmarks are in place to measure the impact of any changes to this method.
565-576: Thedo_addmethod, responsible for adding elements to the structure, correctly handles collisions and ensures immutability by creating new nodes as needed. Pay special attention to the handling of maximum shift values and collision nodes to ensure correctness. Performance considerations should also be taken into account, especially for deep structures.src/immer/detail/rbts/position.hpp (60)
16-16: Including<utility>is a good practice, especially when usingstd::forwardand other utility functions/templates in template-heavy code. This ensures that all necessary functionalities are available without relying on indirect inclusions.
41-41: Thenode()member function provides direct access to the internal node pointer. While this is common in internal or low-level code, ensure that exposing such pointers does not inadvertently lead to unsafe access patterns or modifications outside of controlled mechanisms.
43-43: Thesize()member function returning0forempty_regular_posandempty_leaf_posstructures is consistent with the semantics of these positions representing "empty" states. This clear definition helps in maintaining predictable behavior in algorithms that utilize these positions.
46-52: The use of emptyeachandeach_predfunctions inempty_regular_posandempty_leaf_posstructures is a good design choice. It allows these structures to be used polymorphically with other position types without special-casing for emptiness. This approach simplifies algorithms that iterate over positions.
55-55: Thevisitfunction template correctly forwards its arguments to the visitor'svisit_regularfunction. This use of perfect forwarding (std::forward) is essential for maintaining argument liveness and optimization opportunities in template-heavy code.
74-74: Similar to theempty_regular_pos, thenode()function inempty_leaf_posexposes the internal node pointer. While necessary for the library's internal workings, caution should be exercised to prevent misuse.
76-76: The consistency in returning0for thesize()function across different "empty" position types (empty_regular_posandempty_leaf_pos) is good for maintaining predictable behavior in algorithms that utilize these positions.
78-79: Thevisitfunction inempty_leaf_poscorrectly forwards its arguments to the visitor'svisit_leaffunction, utilizing perfect forwarding. This is a good practice in template programming, ensuring argument optimization.
103-103: Thenode()function providing direct access to the internal node pointer in various position structures is a necessary part of the library's design. However, it's important to ensure that this does not lead to unsafe access patterns.
104-104: Returning the actual size in thesize()function forleaf_posand similar structures is crucial for algorithms that depend on the size of the position. This ensures that the behavior is consistent with the semantics of these positions.
109-109: Thevisitfunction template inleaf_posand similar structures correctly forwards its arguments, maintaining the efficiency and correctness of argument passing. This consistent use of perfect forwarding is commendable.
135-135: Thenode()function's presence across various position structures, includingleaf_sub_pos, underscores the importance of direct node access in the library's design. It's crucial to ensure safe usage patterns.
136-136: Thesize()function's implementation inleaf_sub_posand similar structures returning the actual size is essential for the correct functioning of algorithms that operate on these positions.
141-141: Thevisitfunction inleaf_sub_posand similar structures demonstrates good practice by correctly forwarding arguments to the visitor's function, ensuring efficient and correct argument passing.
165-165: As with other position structures, thenode()function inleaf_descent_posprovides necessary internal node access. Ensuring that this access is used safely and appropriately is important.
170-170: Thedescendfunction being empty inleaf_descent_posindicates that this position type represents a terminal or leaf-level position in the structure. This design choice simplifies the handling of leaf-level operations.
173-173: Thevisitfunction inleaf_descent_posand similar structures using perfect forwarding is a consistent and commendable practice, ensuring efficient and correct argument passing.
197-197: Direct access to the internal node pointer via thenode()function is a recurring pattern across position structures. While necessary, it's crucial to ensure that this does not lead to unsafe access patterns.
198-198: Thesize()function returning the maximum size forfull_leaf_posand similar structures is crucial for algorithms that depend on the size of the position, ensuring consistency with the semantics of these positions.
203-203: Thevisitfunction infull_leaf_posand similar structures demonstrates good practice by correctly forwarding arguments to the visitor's function, ensuring efficient and correct argument passing.
229-229: Thenode()function providing direct access to the internal node pointer in various position structures is a necessary part of the library's design. However, it's important to ensure that this does not lead to unsafe access patterns.
230-230: Returning the actual size in thesize()function forregular_posand similar structures is crucial for algorithms that depend on the size of the position. This ensures that the behavior is consistent with the semantics of these positions.
234-234: Thethis_size()function inregular_posprovides a calculated size based on the position's current state. This function is essential for algorithms that need to know the exact size of the current position, especially in non-leaf nodes.
241-243: Theeachfunction inregular_posand similar structures is designed to iterate over elements or positions, invoking a visitor for each. This pattern is crucial for traversing and operating on the data structure efficiently.
247-249: Theeach_predfunction inregular_posand similar structures, which iterates with a predicate, is a flexible mechanism for traversing the structure with conditional logic. This adds a layer of utility for more complex operations.
253-255: Theeach_pred_zipfunction inregular_posand similar structures, designed for zipping two structures together with a predicate, is an advanced utility that enhances the flexibility and power of the data structure's traversal capabilities.
259-261: Theeach_pred_ifunction inregular_posand similar structures, which iterates with a predicate over a specified range, is a valuable utility for targeted traversal and operations within the data structure.
265-267: Theeach_pred_rightfunction inregular_posand similar structures, designed for right-biased conditional iteration, adds a specialized traversal capability, enhancing the data structure's utility for specific use cases.
271-273: Theeach_pred_leftfunction inregular_posand similar structures, designed for left-biased conditional iteration, further extends the data structure's traversal capabilities, catering to a wide range of use cases.
277-279: Theeach_ifunction inregular_posand similar structures, designed for iterating over a specified range, is a crucial utility for targeted operations within the data structure, enhancing its flexibility and utility.
283-285: Theeach_rightfunction inregular_posand similar structures, designed for right-biased iteration, adds a specialized traversal capability, enhancing the data structure's utility for specific use cases.
289-291: Theeach_leftfunction inregular_posand similar structures, designed for left-biased iteration, further extends the data structure's traversal capabilities, catering to a wide range of use cases.
295-298: Thetowardsfunction inregular_posand similar structures, designed for navigating towards a specific index, is a powerful utility for direct access and manipulation within the data structure, enhancing its flexibility and efficiency.
301-306: Thetowards_ohfunction inregular_posand similar structures, which navigates towards a specific index with an offset hint, is an optimization that enhances the efficiency of navigation within the data structure.
309-317: Thetowards_oh_chfunction inregular_posand similar structures, which navigates towards a specific index with both offset and count hints, is an advanced optimization that further enhances navigation efficiency.
320-324: Thetowards_sub_ohfunction inregular_posand similar structures, designed for navigating towards a sub-position with an offset hint, is a specialized utility that enhances the data structure's flexibility and navigation efficiency.
328-330: Thelast_ohfunction inregular_posand similar structures, designed for navigating to the last position with an offset hint, is a useful utility for efficient access to terminal elements or positions within the data structure.
332-332: Thevisitfunction inregular_posand similar structures using perfect forwarding is a consistent and commendable practice, ensuring efficient and correct argument passing.
344-346: Theeach_regularfunction template correctly handles the iteration over nodes, utilizing prefetching for performance optimization. This attention to performance in iteration patterns is commendable.
366-368: Theeach_pred_regularfunction template, designed for conditional iteration over nodes, correctly handles the logic for both leaf and non-leaf nodes. This flexibility is crucial for the data structure's comprehensive traversal capabilities.
386-389: Theeach_pred_zip_regularfunction template, designed for zipping two structures together with a predicate, demonstrates an advanced utility that enhances the data structure's traversal and comparison capabilities.
416-417: Theeach_pred_i_regularfunction template, which iterates with a predicate over a specified range, is a valuable utility for targeted traversal and operations within the data structure.
482-483: Theeach_pred_left_regularfunction template, designed for left-biased conditional iteration, further extends the data structure's traversal capabilities, catering to a wide range of use cases.
499-501: Theeach_pred_right_regularfunction template, designed for right-biased conditional iteration, adds a specialized traversal capability, enhancing the data structure's utility for specific use cases.
600-602: Theeach_right_regularfunction template, designed for right-biased iteration, adds a specialized traversal capability, enhancing the data structure's utility for specific use cases.
624-626: Thetowards_oh_ch_regularfunction template, which navigates towards a specific index with both offset and count hints, is an advanced optimization that further enhances navigation efficiency.
649-650: Thetowards_sub_oh_regularfunction template, designed for navigating towards a sub-position with an offset hint, is a specialized utility that enhances the data structure's flexibility and navigation efficiency.
673-674: Thelast_oh_regularfunction template, designed for navigating to the last position with an offset hint, is a useful utility for efficient access to terminal elements or positions within the data structure.
687-687: Themake_regular_posfunction correctly asserts the preconditions for creating aregular_posinstance. This includes ensuring that the node is not null, the shift is at least as large as the leaf bits, and the size is greater than zero. These checks are crucial for maintaining the integrity of the data structure.
700-710: Thenull_sub_posstructure provides a null object pattern implementation for sub-positions. This is a useful design pattern for simplifying client code by allowing it to treat null and non-null sub-positions uniformly without explicit null checks.
727-728: Thenode()function insingleton_regular_sub_posreturningnullptris consistent with the semantics of this position type, which represents a fake regular position made out of a single child. This design choice simplifies handling single leaf nodes as whole trees.
732-732: Thesize_beforefunction insingleton_regular_sub_posreturning0is appropriate for this position type, as it represents a single child with no preceding siblings. This simplifies calculations related to size and position within the data structure.
737-737: Theeach_left_subfunction insingleton_regular_sub_posbeing empty is consistent with the semantics of this position type, as there are no left siblings to iterate over. This design choice simplifies handling of single leaf nodes.
749-749: Thevisitfunction insingleton_regular_sub_poscorrectly forwards its arguments to the visitor's function, utilizing perfect forwarding. This is a good practice in template programming, ensuring argument optimization.
760-760: Themake_singleton_regular_sub_posfunction correctly asserts the preconditions for creating asingleton_regular_sub_posinstance, including ensuring that the leaf is not null, it is of the correct kind, and the count is greater than zero. These checks are crucial for maintaining the integrity of the data structure.
777-777: Thenode()function providing direct access to the internal node pointer in various position structures is a necessary part of the library's design. However, it's important to ensure that this does not lead to unsafe access patterns.
778-778: Returning the actual size in thesize()function forregular_sub_posand similar structures is crucial for algorithms that depend on the size of the position. This ensures that the behavior is consistent with the semantics of these positions.
782-782: Thesize_beforefunction inregular_sub_posprovides a calculated size based on the position's current state. This function is essential for algorithms that need to know the exact size before a certain position, especially in non-leaf nodes.
816-816: Theeachfunction inregular_sub_posand similar structures is designed to iterate over elements or positions, invoking a visitor for each. This pattern is crucial for traversing and operating on the data structure efficiently.
822-822: Theeach_predfunction inregular_sub_posand similar structures, which iterates with a predicate, is a flexible mechanism for traversing the structure with conditional logic. This adds a layer of utility for more complex operations.src/wallet/wallet.cpp (2)
7-7: Includingboost/filesystem/operations.hppis a good practice for file manipulation tasks. However, it's important to ensure that this addition does not introduce any unnecessary dependencies or overhead. Given the context of the changes, this inclusion seems justified to leverageboost::filesystemfor file path handling and backup functionality.
675-675: The logic to ensure the wallet file is a plain filename without a directory by comparing it to its stem plus extension is a clever use ofboost::filesystem. This check enhances security by enforcing that the wallet file resides within the expected directory. However, it's crucial to ensure that this change does not inadvertently block valid use cases or configurations. Additionally, consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind this check for future maintainability.
| const auto copyOptions = boost::filesystem::copy_options::overwrite_existing; | ||
| boost::filesystem::copy(pathSrc, pathDest, copyOptions); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The conditional compilation based on the BOOST_VERSION and the use of boost::filesystem::copy_options::overwrite_existing for boost::filesystem::copy is a robust approach to handle file copying with version compatibility in mind. This ensures that the backup functionality works as expected across different versions of Boost. It's advisable to add error handling around the boost::filesystem::copy call to manage any exceptions that might arise during the backup process, ensuring the application can gracefully handle failures.
#if BOOST_VERSION >= 104000
const auto copyOptions = boost::filesystem::copy_options::overwrite_existing;
+ try {
boost::filesystem::copy(pathSrc, pathDest, copyOptions);
+ } catch (const boost::filesystem::filesystem_error& e) {
+ // Handle error, e.g., log the error or notify the user
+ }
#else
boost::filesystem::copy_file(pathSrc, pathDest);
#endifCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| const auto copyOptions = boost::filesystem::copy_options::overwrite_existing; | |
| boost::filesystem::copy(pathSrc, pathDest, copyOptions); | |
| #if BOOST_VERSION >= 104000 | |
| const auto copyOptions = boost::filesystem::copy_options::overwrite_existing; | |
| try { | |
| boost::filesystem::copy(pathSrc, pathDest, copyOptions); | |
| } catch (const boost::filesystem::filesystem_error& e) { | |
| // Handle error, e.g., log the error or notify the user | |
| } | |
| #else | |
| boost::filesystem::copy_file(pathSrc, pathDest); | |
| #endif |
| auto ts = size - tail_off; | ||
| if (ts < branches<BL>) { | ||
| auto new_tail = node_t::copy_leaf_emplace(tail, ts, | ||
| std::move(value)); | ||
| return { size + 1, shift, root->inc(), new_tail }; | ||
| auto new_tail = | ||
| node_t::copy_leaf_emplace(tail, ts, std::move(value)); | ||
| return {size + 1, shift, root->inc(), new_tail}; | ||
| } else { | ||
| auto new_tail = node_t::make_leaf_n(1, std::move(value)); | ||
| try { | ||
| IMMER_TRY { | ||
| if (tail_off == size_t{branches<B>} << shift) { | ||
| auto new_root = node_t::make_inner_n(2); | ||
| try { | ||
| auto path = node_t::make_path(shift, tail); | ||
| new_root->inner() [0] = root; | ||
| new_root->inner() [1] = path; | ||
| IMMER_TRY { | ||
| auto path = node_t::make_path(shift, tail); | ||
| new_root->inner()[0] = root; | ||
| new_root->inner()[1] = path; | ||
| root->inc(); | ||
| tail->inc(); | ||
| return { size + 1, shift + B, new_root, new_tail }; | ||
| } catch (...) { | ||
| return {size + 1, shift + B, new_root, new_tail}; | ||
| } | ||
| IMMER_CATCH (...) { | ||
| node_t::delete_inner(new_root, 2); | ||
| throw; | ||
| IMMER_RETHROW; | ||
| } | ||
| } else if (tail_off) { | ||
| auto new_root = make_regular_sub_pos(root, shift, tail_off) | ||
| .visit(push_tail_visitor<node_t>{}, tail); | ||
| auto new_root = | ||
| make_regular_sub_pos(root, shift, tail_off) | ||
| .visit(push_tail_visitor<node_t>{}, tail); | ||
| tail->inc(); | ||
| return { size + 1, shift, new_root, new_tail }; | ||
| return {size + 1, shift, new_root, new_tail}; | ||
| } else { | ||
| auto new_root = node_t::make_path(shift, tail); | ||
| tail->inc(); | ||
| return { size + 1, shift, new_root, new_tail }; | ||
| return {size + 1, shift, new_root, new_tail}; | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (...) { | ||
| } | ||
| IMMER_CATCH (...) { | ||
| node_t::delete_leaf(new_tail, 1); | ||
| throw; | ||
| IMMER_RETHROW; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The push_back() method, similar to push_back_mut(), handles adding elements to the tree, creating a new tree instance in the process. This method also involves complex logic and exception handling. Ensure that:
- The exception safety is guaranteed, particularly in operations that might throw, to prevent memory leaks or inconsistent states.
- The logic for handling different tree states (e.g., when the tail is full) is thoroughly tested.
Given the complexity of this method, consider expanding the test coverage to include scenarios that stress the tree's branching logic and memory management.
Would you like assistance in expanding the test coverage for this method?
| ~champ() { dec(); } | ||
|
|
||
| void inc() const { root->inc(); } | ||
|
|
||
| void dec() const | ||
| { | ||
| dec(); | ||
| if (root->dec()) | ||
| node_t::delete_deep(root, 0); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The destructor ~champ() and the dec() method are crucial for managing the lifetime of nodes correctly. It's important to ensure that memory management is handled correctly to avoid leaks or premature deletions. Consider adding unit tests specifically targeting the lifecycle management of nodes to ensure robustness.
Would you like me to help with creating additional unit tests for lifecycle management?
| template <typename Iter, | ||
| typename Sent, | ||
| std::enable_if_t<compatible_sentinel_v<Iter, Sent>, bool> = true> | ||
| static auto from_range(Iter first, Sent last) | ||
| { | ||
| auto e = owner_t{}; | ||
| auto result = champ{empty()}; | ||
| for (; first != last; ++first) | ||
| result.add_mut(e, *first); | ||
| return result; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to the from_initializer_list method, from_range provides a way to construct a champ instance from a range. This method is a valuable addition for creating instances from various container types. Ensure that the method is tested with different range types to verify compatibility and performance.
Would you like assistance in creating comprehensive tests for the from_range method to ensure compatibility with different range types?
| void diff(const champ& new_champ, Differ&& differ) const | ||
| { | ||
| diff<EqualValue>(root, new_champ.root, 0, std::forward<Differ>(differ)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| template <typename EqualValue, typename Differ> | ||
| void diff(const node_t* old_node, | ||
| const node_t* new_node, | ||
| count_t depth, | ||
| Differ&& differ) const | ||
| { | ||
| if (old_node == new_node) | ||
| return; | ||
| if (depth < max_depth<B>) { | ||
| auto old_nodemap = old_node->nodemap(); | ||
| auto new_nodemap = new_node->nodemap(); | ||
| auto old_datamap = old_node->datamap(); | ||
| auto new_datamap = new_node->datamap(); | ||
| auto old_bits = old_nodemap | old_datamap; | ||
| auto new_bits = new_nodemap | new_datamap; | ||
| auto changes = old_bits ^ new_bits; | ||
|
|
||
| // added bits | ||
| for (auto bit : set_bits_range<bitmap_t>(new_bits & changes)) { | ||
| if (new_nodemap & bit) { | ||
| auto offset = new_node->children_count(bit); | ||
| auto child = new_node->children()[offset]; | ||
| for_each_chunk_traversal( | ||
| child, | ||
| depth + 1, | ||
| [&](auto const& begin, auto const& end) { | ||
| for (auto it = begin; it != end; it++) | ||
| differ.added(*it); | ||
| }); | ||
| } else if (new_datamap & bit) { | ||
| auto offset = new_node->data_count(bit); | ||
| auto const& value = new_node->values()[offset]; | ||
| differ.added(value); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // removed bits | ||
| for (auto bit : set_bits_range<bitmap_t>(old_bits & changes)) { | ||
| if (old_nodemap & bit) { | ||
| auto offset = old_node->children_count(bit); | ||
| auto child = old_node->children()[offset]; | ||
| for_each_chunk_traversal( | ||
| child, | ||
| depth + 1, | ||
| [&](auto const& begin, auto const& end) { | ||
| for (auto it = begin; it != end; it++) | ||
| differ.removed(*it); | ||
| }); | ||
| } else if (old_datamap & bit) { | ||
| auto offset = old_node->data_count(bit); | ||
| auto const& value = old_node->values()[offset]; | ||
| differ.removed(value); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // bits in both nodes | ||
| for (auto bit : set_bits_range<bitmap_t>(old_bits & new_bits)) { | ||
| if ((old_nodemap & bit) && (new_nodemap & bit)) { | ||
| auto old_offset = old_node->children_count(bit); | ||
| auto new_offset = new_node->children_count(bit); | ||
| auto old_child = old_node->children()[old_offset]; | ||
| auto new_child = new_node->children()[new_offset]; | ||
| diff<EqualValue>(old_child, new_child, depth + 1, differ); | ||
| } else if ((old_datamap & bit) && (new_nodemap & bit)) { | ||
| diff_data_node<EqualValue>( | ||
| old_node, new_node, bit, depth, differ); | ||
| } else if ((old_nodemap & bit) && (new_datamap & bit)) { | ||
| diff_node_data<EqualValue>( | ||
| old_node, new_node, bit, depth, differ); | ||
| } else if ((old_datamap & bit) && (new_datamap & bit)) { | ||
| diff_data_data<EqualValue>(old_node, new_node, bit, differ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| diff_collisions<EqualValue>(old_node, new_node, differ); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The diff methods (overloaded for different scenarios) provide functionality to compare two champ instances and identify differences. This is a complex feature that requires careful testing to ensure correctness across various cases (additions, removals, changes). Consider adding extensive unit tests covering edge cases and complex scenarios.
Would you like me to help with creating extensive unit tests for the diff functionality to cover edge cases and complex scenarios?
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)(Project{}( | ||
| detail::as_const(*fst))))), | ||
| false}; | ||
| return {node_t::copy_collision_insert( | ||
| node, | ||
| Combine{}(std::forward<K>(k), | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)(Default{}()))), | ||
| true}; | ||
| } else { | ||
| auto idx = (hash & (mask<B> << shift)) >> shift; | ||
| auto bit = bitmap_t{1u} << idx; | ||
| if (node->nodemap() & bit) { | ||
| auto offset = popcount(node->nodemap() & (bit - 1)); | ||
| auto offset = node->children_count(bit); | ||
| auto result = do_update<Project, Default, Combine>( | ||
| node->children() [offset], k, std::forward<Fn>(fn), | ||
| hash, shift + B); | ||
| try { | ||
| result.first = node_t::copy_inner_replace( | ||
| node, offset, result.first); | ||
| node->children()[offset], | ||
| k, | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn), | ||
| hash, | ||
| shift + B); | ||
| IMMER_TRY { | ||
| result.node = | ||
| node_t::copy_inner_replace(node, offset, result.node); | ||
| return result; | ||
| } catch (...) { | ||
| node_t::delete_deep_shift(result.first, shift + B); | ||
| throw; | ||
| } | ||
| IMMER_CATCH (...) { | ||
| node_t::delete_deep_shift(result.node, shift + B); | ||
| IMMER_RETHROW; | ||
| } | ||
| } else if (node->datamap() & bit) { | ||
| auto offset = popcount(node->datamap() & (bit - 1)); | ||
| auto offset = node->data_count(bit); | ||
| auto val = node->values() + offset; | ||
| if (Equal{}(*val, k)) | ||
| return { | ||
| node_t::copy_inner_replace_value( | ||
| node, offset, Combine{}(std::forward<K>(k), | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)( | ||
| Project{}(*val)))), | ||
| false | ||
| }; | ||
| return {node_t::copy_inner_replace_value( | ||
| node, | ||
| offset, | ||
| Combine{}(std::forward<K>(k), | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)(Project{}( | ||
| detail::as_const(*val))))), | ||
| false}; | ||
| else { | ||
| auto child = node_t::make_merged( | ||
| shift + B, Combine{}(std::forward<K>(k), | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)( | ||
| Default{}())), | ||
| hash, *val, Hash{}(*val)); | ||
| try { | ||
| return { | ||
| node_t::copy_inner_replace_merged( | ||
| node, bit, offset, child), | ||
| true | ||
| }; | ||
| } catch (...) { | ||
| shift + B, | ||
| Combine{}(std::forward<K>(k), | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)(Default{}())), | ||
| hash, | ||
| *val, | ||
| Hash{}(*val)); | ||
| IMMER_TRY { | ||
| return {node_t::copy_inner_replace_merged( | ||
| node, bit, offset, child), | ||
| true}; | ||
| } | ||
| IMMER_CATCH (...) { | ||
| node_t::delete_deep_shift(child, shift + B); | ||
| throw; | ||
| IMMER_RETHROW; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| return { | ||
| node_t::copy_inner_insert_value( | ||
| node, bit, Combine{}(std::forward<K>(k), | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)( | ||
| Default{}()))), | ||
| true | ||
| }; | ||
| return {node_t::copy_inner_insert_value( | ||
| node, | ||
| bit, | ||
| Combine{}(std::forward<K>(k), | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)(Default{}()))), | ||
| true}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The do_update method provides a way to update elements within the structure, potentially adding new elements if they do not exist. This method's complexity requires thorough testing, especially for edge cases involving inner node replacements and value updates. Consider edge cases where updates might lead to unexpected structure changes.
Would you like me to help with creating tests for edge cases in the do_update method to ensure it handles all scenarios correctly?
| std::forward<K>(k), | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)(Project{}(std::move(*fst)))); | ||
| return {node, false, true}; | ||
| } else { | ||
| auto r = node_t::copy_collision_replace( | ||
| node, | ||
| fst, | ||
| Combine{}(std::forward<K>(k), | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)( | ||
| Project{}(detail::as_const(*fst))))); | ||
| return {node_t::owned(r, e), false, false}; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| auto v = Combine{}(std::forward<K>(k), | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)(Default{}())); | ||
| auto mutate = node->can_mutate(e); | ||
| auto r = mutate ? node_t::move_collision_insert(node, std::move(v)) | ||
| : node_t::copy_collision_insert(node, std::move(v)); | ||
| return {node_t::owned(r, e), true, mutate}; | ||
| } else { | ||
| auto idx = (hash & (mask<B> << shift)) >> shift; | ||
| auto bit = bitmap_t{1u} << idx; | ||
| if (node->nodemap() & bit) { | ||
| auto offset = node->children_count(bit); | ||
| auto child = node->children()[offset]; | ||
| if (node->can_mutate(e)) { | ||
| auto result = do_update_mut<Project, Default, Combine>( | ||
| e, child, k, std::forward<Fn>(fn), hash, shift + B); | ||
| node->children()[offset] = result.node; | ||
| if (!result.mutated && child->dec()) | ||
| node_t::delete_deep_shift(child, shift + B); | ||
| return {node, result.added, true}; | ||
| } else { | ||
| auto result = do_update<Project, Default, Combine>( | ||
| child, k, std::forward<Fn>(fn), hash, shift + B); | ||
| IMMER_TRY { | ||
| result.node = node_t::copy_inner_replace( | ||
| node, offset, result.node); | ||
| node_t::owned(result.node, e); | ||
| return {result.node, result.added, false}; | ||
| } | ||
| IMMER_CATCH (...) { | ||
| node_t::delete_deep_shift(result.node, shift + B); | ||
| IMMER_RETHROW; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } else if (node->datamap() & bit) { | ||
| auto offset = node->data_count(bit); | ||
| auto val = node->values() + offset; | ||
| if (Equal{}(*val, k)) { | ||
| if (node->can_mutate(e)) { | ||
| auto vals = node->ensure_mutable_values(e); | ||
| vals[offset] = Combine{}(std::forward<K>(k), | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)(Project{}( | ||
| std::move(vals[offset])))); | ||
| return {node, false, true}; | ||
| } else { | ||
| auto r = node_t::copy_inner_replace_value( | ||
| node, | ||
| offset, | ||
| Combine{}(std::forward<K>(k), | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)( | ||
| Project{}(detail::as_const(*val))))); | ||
| return {node_t::owned_values(r, e), false, false}; | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| auto mutate = node->can_mutate(e); | ||
| auto mutate_values = mutate && node->can_mutate_values(e); | ||
| auto hash2 = Hash{}(*val); | ||
| auto child = node_t::make_merged_e( | ||
| e, | ||
| shift + B, | ||
| Combine{}(std::forward<K>(k), | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)(Default{}())), | ||
| hash, | ||
| mutate_values ? std::move(*val) : *val, | ||
| hash2); | ||
| IMMER_TRY { | ||
| auto r = mutate ? node_t::move_inner_replace_merged( | ||
| e, node, bit, offset, child) | ||
| : node_t::copy_inner_replace_merged( | ||
| node, bit, offset, child); | ||
| return {node_t::owned_values_safe(r, e), true, mutate}; | ||
| } | ||
| IMMER_CATCH (...) { | ||
| node_t::delete_deep_shift(child, shift + B); | ||
| IMMER_RETHROW; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| auto mutate = node->can_mutate(e); | ||
| auto v = Combine{}(std::forward<K>(k), | ||
| std::forward<Fn>(fn)(Default{}())); | ||
| auto r = mutate ? node_t::move_inner_insert_value( | ||
| e, node, bit, std::move(v)) | ||
| : node_t::copy_inner_insert_value( | ||
| node, bit, std::move(v)); | ||
| return {node_t::owned_values(r, e), true, mutate}; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The do_update_mut method introduces mutable updates, which can improve performance but also adds complexity. Ensure that the mutation conditions are strictly controlled and that fallback mechanisms (e.g., copying when mutation is not possible) are correctly implemented. This method's correctness and performance impact should be thoroughly evaluated.
Would you like assistance in evaluating the correctness and performance impact of the mutable update functionality provided by do_update_mut?
| sub_result | ||
| do_sub(node_t* node, const K& k, hash_t hash, shift_t shift) const | ||
| { | ||
| if (shift == max_shift<B>) { | ||
| auto fst = node->collisions(); | ||
| auto lst = fst + node->collision_count(); | ||
| for (auto cur = fst; cur != lst; ++cur) | ||
| if (Equal{}(*cur, k)) | ||
| return node->collision_count() > 2 | ||
| ? node_t::copy_collision_remove(node, cur) | ||
| : sub_result{fst + (cur == fst)}; | ||
| ? node_t::copy_collision_remove(node, cur) | ||
| : sub_result{fst + (cur == fst)}; | ||
| #if !defined(_MSC_VER) | ||
| #if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__clang__) | ||
| #pragma GCC diagnostic push | ||
| #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wmaybe-uninitialized" | ||
| #endif | ||
| #endif | ||
| // Apparently GCC is generating this warning sometimes when | ||
| // compiling the benchmarks. It makes however no sense at all. | ||
| return {}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The do_sub method, which likely handles element removal, uses a complex logic flow that includes handling collisions and adjusting the structure accordingly. The use of compiler-specific pragmas to suppress warnings is concerning and may indicate underlying issues. Ensure that the logic is correct and consider refactoring to eliminate the need for suppressing warnings.
Consider refactoring the do_sub method to address the underlying issues causing compiler warnings, rather than suppressing them. This may improve code maintainability and prevent potential bugs.
| auto child = children[offset]; | ||
| auto result = | ||
| mutate ? do_sub_mut(e, child, k, hash, shift + B, store) | ||
| : do_sub(child, k, hash, shift + B); | ||
| switch (result.kind) { | ||
| case sub_result::nothing: | ||
| return {}; | ||
| case sub_result::singleton: | ||
| if (node->datamap() == 0 && node->children_count() == 1 && | ||
| shift > 0) { | ||
| if (mutate) { | ||
| node_t::delete_inner(node); | ||
| if (!result.mutated && child->dec()) | ||
| node_t::delete_deep_shift(child, shift + B); | ||
| } | ||
| return {result.data.singleton, result.owned, mutate}; | ||
| } else { | ||
| auto r = | ||
| mutate ? node_t::move_inner_replace_inline( | ||
| e, | ||
| node, | ||
| bit, | ||
| offset, | ||
| result.owned | ||
| ? std::move(*result.data.singleton) | ||
| : *result.data.singleton) | ||
| : node_t::copy_inner_replace_inline( | ||
| node, | ||
| bit, | ||
| offset, | ||
| *result.data.singleton); | ||
| if (result.owned) | ||
| detail::destroy_at(result.data.singleton); | ||
| if (!result.mutated && mutate && child->dec()) | ||
| node_t::delete_deep_shift(child, shift + B); | ||
| return {node_t::owned_values(r, e), mutate}; | ||
| } | ||
| case sub_result::tree: | ||
| if (mutate) { | ||
| children[offset] = result.data.tree; | ||
| if (!result.mutated && child->dec()) | ||
| node_t::delete_deep_shift(child, shift + B); | ||
| return {node, true}; | ||
| } else { | ||
| IMMER_TRY { | ||
| auto r = node_t::copy_inner_replace( | ||
| node, offset, result.data.tree); | ||
| return {node_t::owned(r, e), false}; | ||
| } | ||
| IMMER_CATCH (...) { | ||
| node_t::delete_deep_shift(result.data.tree, | ||
| shift + B); | ||
| IMMER_RETHROW; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } else if (node->datamap() & bit) { | ||
| auto offset = node->data_count(bit); | ||
| auto val = node->values() + offset; | ||
| auto mutate_values = mutate && node->can_mutate_values(e); | ||
| if (Equal{}(*val, k)) { | ||
| auto nv = node->data_count(); | ||
| if (node->nodemap() || nv > 2) { | ||
| auto r = mutate ? node_t::move_inner_remove_value( | ||
| e, node, bit, offset) | ||
| : node_t::copy_inner_remove_value( | ||
| node, bit, offset); | ||
| return {node_t::owned_values_safe(r, e), mutate}; | ||
| } else if (nv == 2) { | ||
| if (shift > 0) { | ||
| if (mutate_values) { | ||
| auto r = new (store) | ||
| T{std::move(node->values()[!offset])}; | ||
| node_t::delete_inner(node); | ||
| return {r, true}; | ||
| } else { | ||
| return {node->values() + !offset, false}; | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| auto& v = node->values()[!offset]; | ||
| auto r = node_t::make_inner_n( | ||
| 0, | ||
| node->datamap() & ~bit, | ||
| mutate_values ? std::move(v) : v); | ||
| assert(!node->nodemap()); | ||
| if (mutate) | ||
| node_t::delete_inner(node); | ||
| return {node_t::owned_values(r, e), mutate}; | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| assert(shift == 0); | ||
| if (mutate) | ||
| node_t::delete_inner(node); | ||
| return {empty(), mutate}; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return {}; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The do_sub_mut method introduces mutable operations for element removal, which can optimize performance but adds complexity. Ensure that mutation conditions are well-defined and that the method correctly handles all scenarios, including edge cases involving collisions and deep structure modifications. Thorough testing is required to ensure the method's correctness and efficiency.
Would you like me to help with creating comprehensive tests for the do_sub_mut method to ensure it handles all scenarios correctly and efficiently?
| , data{std::move(n)} | ||
| {} | ||
|
|
||
| inner_node_t& inner() & { | ||
| inner_node_t& inner() & | ||
| { | ||
| assert(kind == inner_kind); | ||
| return data.inner; | ||
| } | ||
| const inner_node_t& inner() const& { | ||
| const inner_node_t& inner() const& | ||
| { | ||
| assert(kind == inner_kind); | ||
| return data.inner; | ||
| } | ||
| inner_node_t&& inner() && { | ||
| inner_node_t&& inner() && | ||
| { | ||
| assert(kind == inner_kind); | ||
| return std::move(data.inner); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| leaf_node_t& leaf() & { | ||
| leaf_node_t& leaf() & | ||
| { | ||
| assert(kind == leaf_kind); | ||
| return data.leaf; | ||
| } | ||
| const leaf_node_t& leaf() const& { | ||
| const leaf_node_t& leaf() const& | ||
| { | ||
| assert(kind == leaf_kind); | ||
| return data.leaf; | ||
| } | ||
| leaf_node_t&& leaf() && { | ||
| leaf_node_t&& leaf() && | ||
| { | ||
| assert(kind == leaf_kind); | ||
| return std::move(data.leaf); | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| template <typename T, int B, typename MP, | ||
| typename ...Ts> | ||
| auto make_node(Ts&& ...xs) | ||
| -> boost::intrusive_ptr<node<T, B, MP>> | ||
| template <typename T, int B, typename MP, typename... Ts> | ||
| auto make_node(Ts&&... xs) -> boost::intrusive_ptr<node<T, B, MP>> | ||
| { | ||
| return new node<T, B, MP>(std::forward<Ts>(xs)...); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The search for unit tests or test scripts targeting the destructor behavior of the node struct did not yield any results. This suggests that there may not be any tests within the accessible codebase specifically designed to verify the destructor's handling of both leaf and inner nodes, as outlined in the review comment. Given the importance of such tests in ensuring the prevention of memory leaks or undefined behavior, it may be necessary to develop and incorporate these tests to validate the destructor's functionality thoroughly.
Analysis chain
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [55-130]
The refactoring of the node struct, especially the use of union data_t for leaf and inner nodes, is a significant change. It's crucial to ensure that the destructor correctly handles both types and that this behavior is tested thoroughly to prevent memory leaks or undefined behavior.
Given the context and the need to verify the destructor behavior of the node struct, especially with its use of a union for leaf and inner nodes, it's essential to locate and review any existing tests that cover this functionality. Since the provided script did not perform this verification, let's proceed to search for unit tests or test scripts that target the node struct's destructor to ensure it handles both leaf and inner nodes correctly, preventing memory leaks or undefined behavior.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Placeholder for testing the node struct's destructor behavior
echo "Perform unit testing for the node struct's destructor in dvektor_impl."
Length of output: 153
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files related to the node struct's destructor
fd 'test.*\.(cpp|hpp|h|cc)$' --exec rg --context 5 'node.*::~node\(\)' || echo "No destructor tests found for node struct."
Length of output: 167
aleflm
force-pushed
the
dev/alef/fix-warnings
branch
from
02c83ce to
9580065
Compare
Fixed warnings in Linux / Clang. Fixed warnings in Win cross-compile. no-gui build only.
aleflm
force-pushed
the
dev/alef/fix-warnings
branch
from
9580065 to
65c7034
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we've got a separate PR for immer library update. I think the changes made to the immer directory shouldn't be in this PR if we are to apply this one after #1432
Includes two commits:
immerto a more recent version (v0.8.1 5875f7739a6c642ad58cbedadb509c86d4212). This fixes a lot of random warnings we have in lib immer.Summary by CodeRabbit
map,set, andtableclasses.