[Config] Mark two RCNConfigSettings
properties atomic
#13925
Merged
+8
−2
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The crashing frame is on
objc_release_x0
so I'm thinking that that the instance is being over-released.These properties are never sent in
RCNConfigSettings
's initialization but rather on one of two different queues:firebase-ios-sdk/FirebaseRemoteConfig/Sources/RCNConfigFetch.m
Lines 302 to 311 in 8328630
firebase-ios-sdk/FirebaseRemoteConfig/Sources/RCNConfigRealtime.m
Lines 263 to 272 in 8328630
They are currently marked
nonatomic
, so my hypothesis is that concurrent sets lead to an object with an invalid retain count, and when the property is later accessed here. It causes a crash when trying to over-release the invalid instance.I did some searching and
atomic
seemed to be an acceptable solution. Others were to add a queue insideRCNConfigSettings
which seemed too heavyweight, as well as overwriting the getter and setter to use@synchronized
which seemed reasonable but adding atomic was less LOC.Fix #13898