Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes jupyterlab plugin regressions #779

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2019
Merged

Fixes jupyterlab plugin regressions #779

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2019

Conversation

texodus
Copy link
Member

@texodus texodus commented Oct 21, 2019

No description provided.

@timkpaine timkpaine added JS Jupyter enhancement Feature requests or improvements labels Oct 21, 2019
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 24, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #779 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #779   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.88%   91.88%           
=======================================
  Files          51       51           
  Lines        3390     3390           
=======================================
  Hits         3115     3115           
  Misses        275      275

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bfbda9c...d5dfac7. Read the comment docs.

@texodus texodus merged commit 7f02f09 into master Oct 24, 2019
@texodus texodus deleted the jl-fixes branch October 24, 2019 09:08
@texodus texodus added internal Internal refactoring and code quality improvement and removed enhancement Feature requests or improvements labels Jan 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
internal Internal refactoring and code quality improvement JS Jupyter
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants