Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Table() support for numpy recarray #771

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2019
Merged

Added Table() support for numpy recarray #771

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2019

Conversation

texodus
Copy link
Member

@texodus texodus commented Oct 18, 2019

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #771 into master will decrease coverage by 0.43%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #771      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.42%   91.99%   -0.44%     
==========================================
  Files          50       50              
  Lines        3326     3359      +33     
==========================================
+ Hits         3074     3090      +16     
- Misses        252      269      +17
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
perspective/core/manager.py 69.53% <0%> (-5.23%) ⬇️
perspective/table/_accessor.py 89.24% <0%> (-2.71%) ⬇️
perspective/table/_date_validator.py 86.66% <0%> (-1.71%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 952a27b...d389866. Read the comment docs.

@texodus texodus merged commit cd203b4 into master Oct 18, 2019
@texodus texodus deleted the numpy-recarray branch October 18, 2019 07:58
@texodus texodus added the enhancement Feature requests or improvements label Jan 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Feature requests or improvements
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants