Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Code Quality: Introduced App.Utils.Storage namespace for storage functionalities #12902

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jul 19, 2023

Conversation

0x5bfa
Copy link
Member

@0x5bfa 0x5bfa commented Jul 9, 2023

Code Quality: Introduced App.Utils.Storage namespace for storage functionalities

Motivation & Context

This is all-in-one namespace for storage. If you're looking for storage stuff, you have to look into only this namespace's classes. This namespace probably can be moved to Files.App.Storage project.

  • Improved readability

Warning
Please do not review code lines that I did not changed. I cannot make more diff. If there're more codes that are preferred to change, I will do that and mark that PR as the final one for that stage.

PR Checklist

  • Were these changes approved in an issue or discussion with the project maintainers? In order to prevent extra work, feature requests and changes to the codebase must be approved before the pull request will be reviewed. This prevents extra work for the contributors and maintainers.
    Related Feature: Improving Performance, optimizations, reliability and codebase  #4180
  • Did you build the app and test your changes?
  • Did you check for accessibility? You can use Accessibility Insights for this.
  • Did you remove any strings from the en-us resource file?
    • Did you search the solution to see if the string is still being used?
  • Did you implement any design changes to an existing feature?
    • Was this change approved?
  • Are there any other steps that were used to validate these changes?

Screenshots

image

Copy link
Contributor

@ferrariofilippo ferrariofilippo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@0x5bfa 0x5bfa requested a review from ferrariofilippo July 13, 2023 12:45
@0x5bfa
Copy link
Member Author

0x5bfa commented Jul 13, 2023

@yaira2 I think we can merge?

Copy link
Contributor

@ferrariofilippo ferrariofilippo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@0x5bfa 0x5bfa requested a review from ferrariofilippo July 19, 2023 04:52
Copy link
Contributor

@ferrariofilippo ferrariofilippo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@yaira2 yaira2 merged commit 81df0a6 into files-community:main Jul 19, 2023
@yaira2
Copy link
Member

yaira2 commented Jul 19, 2023

Thank you!

@yaira2 yaira2 added ready to merge Pull requests that are approved and ready to merge and removed needs - code review labels Jul 19, 2023
@0x5bfa 0x5bfa deleted the 5bfa/Add-UtilsStorageNamespace branch September 16, 2023 05:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready to merge Pull requests that are approved and ready to merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants