-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature: Add support for SFTP #2407
Comments
This would be extremely nice and would remove the need for Filezilla and the likes, making it a much more uniform and convenient experience. |
What are the requirements for this feature (eg. how do you expect this feature to work)? |
We can integrate SSH.NET and do what we have done for FTP before. |
Isn't our current implementation of FTP a little slow or am I thinking of regular network drives? |
You're right. I'm expecting FluentFTP to use |
@hez2010 has this been released yet? |
Unfortunately not yet. But I think we can use a custom internal fork. |
Is there any progress on this? |
No one has looked into this yet. |
I'll try looking into it. Is there a filesystem abstraction and stuff that I should do to properly implement everything as possible? I recall seeing many Win32 specific stuff in the codebase that don't seem to be abstracted away well. SSH.NET now has async support I think. cc @yaira2 |
yeah, it would nice if sftp is supported. i found this app, for reference |
@itsWindows11 How is this going? |
Time constraints on my end slowed down things, plus exams are coming up thus slowing down progress more in the next few weeks. I've got some of the basics ready already for SFTP though, will do a PR by the end of this month. Sorry for any inconveniences caused here. |
No worries, was just wondering if this was coming along or not |
Files is using an older fork of the SecureFolderFs storage abstraction, which itself was a fork of the OwlCore.Storage project, an early adoption package for the CommunityToolkit.Storage proposal. I've worked with SecureFolderFS to incorporate their feedback and remove the need to maintain a separate fork, I would suggest we do the same for Files so we aren't duplicating planned work: Arlodotexe/OwlCore.Storage#12, Arlodotexe/OwlCore.Storage#55 |
It's GOOD ?? |
From @tmds, @itsWindows11 How do you think? |
Requirements
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: