Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Add a command for query retrieval price of miners #6017

Closed
askender opened this issue Apr 11, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #7814
Closed

[Feature Request] Add a command for query retrieval price of miners #6017

askender opened this issue Apr 11, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #7814
Labels
area/markets Area: Markets dif/medium Prior development experience with lotus is likely helpful effort/days Effort: Multiple Days P2 P2: Should be resolved

Comments

@askender
Copy link

Clients who will store data in filecoin network need know the retrieval-price of miners before they decide to do so.
But we don't have a command for that.

Describe the solution you'd like
We can add the info of retrieval price in lotus client query-ask f0xxxx and lotus client list-asks

Describe alternatives you've considered
As miners can change the retrieval-price at any time. Clients maybe find that the price is too high for them. We should have a solution for it.

Additional context

  1. the default retrieve price is high maybe. Client maybe pay a lot if forget to add the --maxPrice
   lotus client retrieve
   --maxPrice value  maximum price the client is willing to consider (default: 1 FIL)
  1. the Unseal Price should also be open to everyone.
@dkkapur dkkapur added this to the 🤝 Deal Success milestone May 19, 2021
@jennijuju jennijuju added LotusY and removed tribute labels Nov 30, 2021
@jennijuju jennijuju linked a pull request Nov 30, 2021 that will close this issue
@jennijuju jennijuju removed this from the 🤝 Deal Success milestone Dec 6, 2021
@jennijuju jennijuju added the dif/medium Prior development experience with lotus is likely helpful label Dec 6, 2021
@jennijuju
Copy link
Member

Complete #7397

@dirkmc
Copy link
Contributor

dirkmc commented Dec 17, 2021

Fixed by #7814

magik6k added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2021
Repository owner moved this from Ready To Work to Closed in LotusY Dec 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/markets Area: Markets dif/medium Prior development experience with lotus is likely helpful effort/days Effort: Multiple Days P2 P2: Should be resolved
Projects
Status: Closed
4 participants