Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

If dnf5 and dnf-3 are installed, use dnf5 #55

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jpopelka
Copy link
Member

@jpopelka jpopelka commented May 15, 2024

#57

Previously, dnf-3 was used. I don't see a reason, so let's try-n-error.
fedora-ci#54
anyway, we don't need this as we expect it to show nothing
(we got here because there are no packages in the repo)
also, we don't have to disable the mini-tps copr repo here
if we do that where we enabled it (the prepare.sh in installability pipeline)
@jpopelka jpopelka force-pushed the dnf5 branch 2 times, most recently from c6b5936 to 22e1967 Compare June 17, 2024 13:20
dnf adds allow-erasing flag to transaction by default
(and dnf5 remove has no --allowerasing option)
rpm-software-management/dnf5#729 (comment)
@jpopelka jpopelka merged commit 99d82e4 into fedora-ci:main Jun 17, 2024
9 checks passed
@jpopelka jpopelka deleted the dnf5 branch June 17, 2024 18:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant