-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove transaction from Ingestion #480
Remove transaction from Ingestion #480
Conversation
Hi @imjuanleonard. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a gojek member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test all |
@imjuanleonard: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
/lgtm |
This is to ensure that Redis write in ingestion code does not unnecessarily block all other clients during writing. Since currently in Feast v0.4, this Redis is also shared by Feast Serving, if Feast Ingestion somehow attempts too much write (due to retry maybe or connection error maybe), excessive Redis locks may be used. Redis clients in Feast serving will be blocked and this leads to increased latency in Feast serving (which is usually latency sensitive). Locks/transaction is not really necessary in this case (it is good to have). Atomic writes of a batch of feature values are not really needed because these it's ok it these writes command in a batch are interleaved with other commands, without resulting in corrupted feature values |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: davidheryanto, imjuanleonard The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
some panda library TypeError because of time I guess this is similar to another pipeline |
569fb6b
to
c1bc448
Compare
/assign @davidheryanto |
/retest |
/lgtm |
@imjuanleonard: you cannot LGTM your own PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/lgtm |
(cherry picked from commit c3591ed)
(cherry picked from commit c3591ed)
QA this change first