Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving Feast Java back into main repo under java/ package #1997

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 12, 2021

Conversation

adchia
Copy link
Collaborator

@adchia adchia commented Nov 4, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:
This is almost a verbatim copy of feast java logic back into feast under java/. A couple of key changes:

  • the protos in datatypes have new symlinks to the protos/ base package
  • the "mvn" command (in Makefile and infra scripts) refers to a pom file in the java/ subdirectory
  • renaming of github workflows to be java_[workflow name]
  • removing of makefile definitions that reference non-existent scripts

In followup PRs, we intend to remove:

  • References to Spark ingestion
  • Feast Core (including authentication, credentials)
  • Out of date documentation (e.g. architecture diagrams)
  • Feast Serving references to Feast Core (e.g. CoreSpecService)
  • Feast Serving connectors that are not supported from Python (e.g. BigTable, Cassandra). These can be ported over from Feast Java when we re-introduce those in python (as plugins)

We also will consolidate GitHub actions into master vs release vs PR actions (though we need to verify the actions work first).

As far as releases will go. We will switch back to having one consistent version for Feast Java + Feast Python components. This will require we deprecate the old maven + DockerHub package names (e.g. on https://hub.docker.com/u/feastdev and https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/dev.feast) for Feast Java (since Feast Java is on 0.25.2 whereas the main repo is on 0.15) and update tutorials to reflect this.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Re-introducing Feast Java into main repo

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@adchia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adchia commented Nov 4, 2021

/test all

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@adchia: No jobs can be run with /test all.
The following commands are available to trigger jobs:

  • /test test-core-and-ingestion
  • /test test-serving
  • /test test-java-sdk
  • /test test-usage
  • /test test-golang-sdk

In response to this:

/test all

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@adchia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adchia commented Nov 4, 2021

/test test-core-and-ingestion

@adchia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adchia commented Nov 4, 2021

/test test-serving

@adchia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adchia commented Nov 4, 2021

/test test-java-sdk

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 4, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #1997 (65c2ad7) into master (600d38e) will decrease coverage by 23.33%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1997       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   82.21%   58.88%   -23.34%     
===========================================
  Files         100      101        +1     
  Lines        8052     8106       +54     
===========================================
- Hits         6620     4773     -1847     
- Misses       1432     3333     +1901     
Flag Coverage Δ
integrationtests ?
unittests 58.88% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../integration/online_store/test_universal_online.py 13.90% <0.00%> (-85.57%) ⬇️
.../integration/online_store/test_online_retrieval.py 17.39% <0.00%> (-82.61%) ⬇️
...fline_store/test_universal_historical_retrieval.py 19.41% <0.00%> (-80.00%) ⬇️
sdk/python/tests/utils/online_read_write_test.py 20.68% <0.00%> (-79.32%) ⬇️
...gration/registration/test_feature_service_apply.py 31.25% <0.00%> (-68.75%) ⬇️
sdk/python/feast/infra/online_stores/redis.py 25.17% <0.00%> (-68.71%) ⬇️
sdk/python/tests/data/data_creator.py 34.78% <0.00%> (-65.22%) ⬇️
...s/integration/registration/test_universal_types.py 36.73% <0.00%> (-63.27%) ⬇️
sdk/python/feast/infra/online_stores/datastore.py 30.32% <0.00%> (-63.12%) ⬇️
sdk/python/feast/infra/online_stores/dynamodb.py 30.37% <0.00%> (-60.76%) ⬇️
... and 53 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 600d38e...65c2ad7. Read the comment docs.

@adchia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adchia commented Nov 4, 2021

/retest

@adchia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adchia commented Nov 4, 2021

/test test-serving

@adchia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adchia commented Nov 4, 2021

/test test-core-and-ingestion

@adchia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adchia commented Nov 4, 2021

/test test-java-sdk

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

feast-ci-bot commented Nov 4, 2021

@adchia: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
test-core-and-ingestion 657fd1b687b98e6a19a6bfce1a4cb70e4067ff8c link /test test-core-and-ingestion

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@adchia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adchia commented Nov 4, 2021

/test test-java-sdk

@adchia adchia marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2021 20:24
@adchia adchia requested review from achals, felixwang9817, tsotnet, woop and a team as code owners November 4, 2021 20:24
@adchia adchia assigned pyalex and woop and unassigned felixwang9817 Nov 4, 2021
@adchia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adchia commented Nov 4, 2021

/test test-serving

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
name: mirror
Copy link
Collaborator

@pyalex pyalex Nov 5, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this part is obsolete. It used to mirror to internal repo in Gojek, but that repo is on 0.9-branch

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

<version>5.6.2</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.kafka</groupId>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it seems like we bringing back too much

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ingestion part was supposed to be deleted from feast-java long time ago, but it's possible that not everything was deleted

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed, will in a followup PR remove obsolete sections

@pyalex
Copy link
Collaborator

pyalex commented Nov 5, 2021

Are we gonna support 0.9 registry? I'm confused by the goal of this resurrection. IMO, big part of it should die for good

@woop
Copy link
Member

woop commented Nov 6, 2021

Are we gonna support 0.9 registry? I'm confused by the goal of this resurrection. IMO, big part of it should die for good

As an extension to this question and our conversation yesterday. Would it make sense to list out the exact functionality that will not be supported (and is slated for deletion) after this PR is merged?

Overall the PR looks good to me, as long as we agree a lot of the code will be deleted after merge. In terms of GitHub Actions: We should probably merge the different tests by category (master, pr, release, etc). I think it will be easier for us to manage.

@adchia adchia force-pushed the stream_feature_view branch from 65c2ad7 to fa66cf5 Compare November 9, 2021 19:59
Signed-off-by: Danny Chiao <[email protected]>
@adchia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adchia commented Nov 10, 2021

@pyalex @woop PTAL. Updated the description of the PR with TODOs. We can consolidate workflows in a followup PR

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adchia, pyalex

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@pyalex
Copy link
Collaborator

pyalex commented Nov 11, 2021

/lgtm

@adchia adchia merged commit 63680ba into feast-dev:master Nov 12, 2021
@adchia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adchia commented Nov 12, 2021

@pyalex will fix some tests very soon

@adchia adchia deleted the stream_feature_view branch December 7, 2021 23:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants