Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add nicer validation for repo config #1392

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 20, 2021

Conversation

oavdeev
Copy link
Collaborator

@oavdeev oavdeev commented Mar 16, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:
This adds nicer error messages for the config reader. This PR also adds an additional dep on jsonschema package. This is already a popular dep (for example, for jupyter and great-expectations) so that is arguably not too bad.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Signed-off-by: Oleg Avdeev <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Avdeev <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Avdeev <[email protected]>
@woop
Copy link
Member

woop commented Mar 19, 2021

/lgtm

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: oavdeev, woop

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@feast-ci-bot feast-ci-bot removed the lgtm label Mar 19, 2021
Signed-off-by: Oleg Avdeev <[email protected]>
@woop
Copy link
Member

woop commented Mar 20, 2021

/lgtm

@oavdeev
Copy link
Collaborator Author

oavdeev commented Mar 20, 2021

/test test-telemetry

@feast-ci-bot feast-ci-bot merged commit 046e8e2 into feast-dev:master Mar 20, 2021
@oavdeev oavdeev deleted the config-validation branch March 20, 2021 21:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants