docs: clarify that the result of faker.date.betweens() is sorted #2635
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Inspired by #2633 - wasn't obvious from the docs that the result was sorted.
matthewmayer
added
c: docs
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## next #2635 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 99.57% 99.57%
========================================
Files 2807 2807
Lines 250525 250525
Branches 744 1149 +405
========================================
+ Hits 249454 249455 +1
+ Misses 1071 1042 -29
- Partials 0 28 +28
|
ST-DDT
reviewed
Jan 30, 2024
ST-DDT
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2024
Shinigami92
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2024
import-brain
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2024
This was referenced Sep 13, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Inspired by #2633 - wasn't obvious from the docs that the result was sorted.