Add bike team pursuit benchmark (rewriting 1153)

[teytaud]

Types of changes

• Docs change / refactoring / dependency upgrade
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Motivation and Context / Related issue

See #1153

How Has This Been Tested (if it applies)

Checklist

• The documentation is up-to-date with the changes I made.
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document and completed the CLA (see CLA).
• All tests passed, and additional code has been covered with new tests.

[jrapin]

I guess the following still holds from the hold PR

1. Women and MenTeamPursuit classes look like they could be factorized further, can you point out what differs? For now I am seeing a lot of redundant code, we that much redundancy I may stop providing support for this test case if I need to refactorize some part of ExperimentFunction or the parametrization (no plan yet), because repetitions make maintenance more complicated. -> let's merge as is I guess, but I'm concerned that this can eventually serve as example to other benchmarks which will be far from the quality standard of the others

2. Can you a add a dummy test just to make sure the function works, independently of the benchmark, that could be something as simple as that:

[teytaud]

I factorized quite a bit and added a simple test.

[teytaud]

@ryankroon could we have your opinion here ?

[jrapin]

Please rename the main public facing class to use pep8 convention (capitalized name).
All the others should use the same convention as well in a perfect world... but at the very very least the main one must absolutely.

When that's done, feel free to merge

[ryankroon]

@ryankroon could we have your opinion here ?

Hi @teytaud and @jrapin,
(A bit late now but..) I am happy with the code and all looks good.
Furthermore, I thank you for helping me and completing the final changes / factorising so that my work could be merged - I was struggling a bit with this before.
I also apologise for leaving this work in somewhat of a limbo... I always planned to come back to it at a later date, but I have been very busy the past few months with starting a new job among other commitments.
Overall, I'm glad the work has been merged and I hope the it becomes a good benchmark problem.
Thank you,
Ryan