This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2023. It is now read-only.
Extend COCO evaluation for AbstractDataset #1096
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Extending COCO evaluation
Using the standard
maskrcnn_benchmark/data/datasets/evaluation/coco/
tools, this PR introduces a wrapper that works with any derived class of theAbstractDataset
and translates them into COCO annotation format (details here).To unit-test this functionality the following measurement was carried out:
AbstractCOCO
fromAbstractDataset
COCODataset
insideAbstractCOCO
.e2e_mask_rcnn_R_50_FPN_1x
ande2e_mask_rcnn_R_50_FPN_1x
with each datasetDetailed results
e2e_mask_rcnn_R_50_FPN_1x
COCODataset
AbstractCOCO
e2e_mask_rcnn_R_101_FPN_1x
COCODataset
AbstractCOCO
Differences in precomputed vs binary mask areas
Thanks,
Csabi