[compiler] Validate against setState in useMemo (resubmit of #30552) #30583
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ghstack failed to land #30552 properly, resubmitting Developers sometimes use `useMemo()` as a way to conditionally execute code, including conditionally calling setState. However, the compiler may remove existing useMemo calls if they are not necessary, which _should_ always be a safe optimization. If the useMemo has side effects (eg sets state), then this isn't safe. This PR improves ValidateNoSetStateInRender to disallow any setState in useMemo (even if it's conditional), expanding on the previous check for unconditional setState in render. Note that the approach uses the StartMemoize/FinishMemoize instructions added in DropManualMemo to know whether a particular setState call is within a useMemo or not. This means enabling the validation in DropManualMemo when the setState validation is enabled, but that's fine since that validation is on everywhere by default (_except_ for in fixtures, which we have a todo for) [ghstack-poisoned]
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 2, 2024
ghstack failed to land #30552 properly, resubmitting Developers sometimes use `useMemo()` as a way to conditionally execute code, including conditionally calling setState. However, the compiler may remove existing useMemo calls if they are not necessary, which _should_ always be a safe optimization. If the useMemo has side effects (eg sets state), then this isn't safe. This PR improves ValidateNoSetStateInRender to disallow any setState in useMemo (even if it's conditional), expanding on the previous check for unconditional setState in render. Note that the approach uses the StartMemoize/FinishMemoize instructions added in DropManualMemo to know whether a particular setState call is within a useMemo or not. This means enabling the validation in DropManualMemo when the setState validation is enabled, but that's fine since that validation is on everywhere by default (_except_ for in fixtures, which we have a todo for) ghstack-source-id: 65bb3289c3756855011cb6f181280287a75eaedf Pull Request resolved: #30583
facebook-github-bot
added
CLA Signed
React Core Team
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 2, 2024
ghstack failed to land #30552 properly, resubmitting Developers sometimes use `useMemo()` as a way to conditionally execute code, including conditionally calling setState. However, the compiler may remove existing useMemo calls if they are not necessary, which _should_ always be a safe optimization. If the useMemo has side effects (eg sets state), then this isn't safe. This PR improves ValidateNoSetStateInRender to disallow any setState in useMemo (even if it's conditional), expanding on the previous check for unconditional setState in render. Note that the approach uses the StartMemoize/FinishMemoize instructions added in DropManualMemo to know whether a particular setState call is within a useMemo or not. This means enabling the validation in DropManualMemo when the setState validation is enabled, but that's fine since that validation is on everywhere by default (_except_ for in fixtures, which we have a todo for) ghstack-source-id: 65bb3289c3756855011cb6f181280287a75eaedf Pull Request resolved: #30583
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
ghstack failed to land #30552 properly, resubmitting
Developers sometimes use
useMemo()as a way to conditionally execute code, including conditionally calling setState. However, the compiler may remove existing useMemo calls if they are not necessary, which should always be a safe optimization. If the useMemo has side effects (eg sets state), then this isn't safe.This PR improves ValidateNoSetStateInRender to disallow any setState in useMemo (even if it's conditional), expanding on the previous check for unconditional setState in render. Note that the approach uses the StartMemoize/FinishMemoize instructions added in DropManualMemo to know whether a particular setState call is within a useMemo or not. This means enabling the validation in DropManualMemo when the setState validation is enabled, but that's fine since that validation is on everywhere by default (except for in fixtures, which we have a todo for)