compiler: treat pruned scope outputs as reactive #29790
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like aliasing and control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice. [ghstack-poisoned]
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
This was referenced Jun 6, 2024
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2024
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like aliasing and control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice. ghstack-source-id: ce19c5c26f33653765970cfd546be47943f7aad2 Pull Request resolved: #29790
facebook-github-bot
added
the
React Core Team
|
Comparing: a0a435d...0a5761c Critical size changesIncludes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Significant size changesIncludes any change greater than 0.2%: Expand to show
|
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like aliasing and control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice. [ghstack-poisoned]
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2024
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like aliasing and control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice. ghstack-source-id: 800ca63920ff82f1ed00c046f5ab65f6a057c3ce Pull Request resolved: #29790
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like aliasing and control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice. [ghstack-poisoned]
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2024
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice because PruneNonReactiveDependencies already does basic alias tracking (see new fixture). ghstack-source-id: 0cae8448051e5365c316f246fb2a1637c9e60d2b Pull Request resolved: #29790
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice because PruneNonReactiveDependencies already does basic alias tracking (see new fixture). [ghstack-poisoned]
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2024
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice because PruneNonReactiveDependencies already does basic alias tracking (see new fixture). ghstack-source-id: 0cae8448051e5365c316f246fb2a1637c9e60d2b Pull Request resolved: #29790
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice because PruneNonReactiveDependencies already does basic alias tracking (see new fixture). [ghstack-poisoned]
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2024
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice because PruneNonReactiveDependencies already does basic alias tracking (see new fixture). ghstack-source-id: 19131489bfa44fe8dabefcc5242005a9ad2c2f70 Pull Request resolved: #29790
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice because PruneNonReactiveDependencies already does basic alias tracking (see new fixture). [ghstack-poisoned]
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2024
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice because PruneNonReactiveDependencies already does basic alias tracking (see new fixture). ghstack-source-id: 11f48618d0413075c43ee88529e00e8e523e61f7 Pull Request resolved: #29790
gsathya
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2024
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice because PruneNonReactiveDependencies already does basic alias tracking (see new fixture). [ghstack-poisoned]
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice because PruneNonReactiveDependencies already does basic alias tracking (see new fixture). ghstack-source-id: 364430bbeca4cfca2fbf9df4d92b2e61b3352311 Pull Request resolved: #29790
This was referenced Jun 7, 2024
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2024
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it. The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice because PruneNonReactiveDependencies already does basic alias tracking (see new fixture). ghstack-source-id: 364430bbeca4cfca2fbf9df4d92b2e61b3352311 Pull Request resolved: #29790
This was referenced Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Mostly addresses the issue with non-reactive pruned scopes. Before, values from pruned scopes would not be memoized, but could still be depended upon by downstream scopes. However, those downstream scopes would assume the value could never change. This could allow the developer to observe two different versions of a value - the freshly created one (if observed outside a scope) or a cached one (if observed inside, or through) a scope which used the value but didn't depend on it.
The fix here is to consider the outputs of pruned reactive scopes as reactive. Note that this is a partial fix because of things like control variables — the full solution would be to mark these values as reactive, and then re-run InferReactivePlaces. We can do this once we've fully converted our pipeline to use HIR everywhere. For now, this should fix most issues in practice because PruneNonReactiveDependencies already does basic alias tracking (see new fixture).