-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Edit Docs Making Offline iOS Bundle #9186
Conversation
By analyzing the blame information on this pull request, we identified @hramos and @JoelMarcey to be potential reviewers. |
@@ -24,16 +24,10 @@ In Xcode, select your phone as build target and press "Build and run" | |||
|
|||
You have built a great app using React Native, and you are now itching to release it in the App Store. The process is the same as any other native iOS app, with some additional considerations to take into account. | |||
|
|||
### Disabling the developer menu | |||
### Using the offline bundle & Disabling the developer menu |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we even need the Using the offline bundle
as part of the heading any longer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JoelMarcey I think it could be better title, like Building an app for production
. or Building an app for distribution
.
Using the offline bundle
or Disabling the developer menu
is not enough I think.
The Using the offline bundle
is the aciton, and Disabling the developer menu
is the result. and Building an app for distribution
is what people really want to do and can cover all of other things.
Let's see this sentence, Building an app for distribution using the offline bundle, Disabling the developer menu
. At least this ordering looks better than other ordering. So the title must be Building an app for distribution
or similar things, I think.
what about you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JoelMarcey I'm sorry to have bothered you but could you give me more feedback?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@skatpgusskat Sorry for the delay. Yes, I like the updated title you proposed. Can you update the PR with that? Then I think we can ship this.
@skatpgusskat Thanks! I have one comment. But I think we should be able to land this. |
Summary: via commit 8c29a52 , the way has changed building offline bundle. So this commit update the docs about that.
@skatpgusskat updated the pull request. |
@JoelMarcey I just remove the subtitle because the above title was In later, I guess It should changed with more detail like the screenshots which let people how to set |
Thanks. Sounds reasonable. |
@facebook-github-bot shipit |
Thanks for importing.If you are an FB employee go to Phabricator to review internal test results. |
20c6d11
Summary: via commit 8c29a52 , the way has changed building offline bundle. So this commit update the docs about that. Closes facebook#9186 Differential Revision: D3682643 Pulled By: JoelMarcey fbshipit-source-id: 3e4127ca0c00f254dc3464e73c1c2496c0710b85
Summary: via commit 8c29a52 , the way has changed building offline bundle. So this commit update the docs about that. Closes facebook#9186 Differential Revision: D3682643 Pulled By: JoelMarcey fbshipit-source-id: 3e4127ca0c00f254dc3464e73c1c2496c0710b85
via commit 8c29a52 , the way has changed building offline bundle. So this commit update the docs about that.