-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 312
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace self._curr.model with self._curr.fitted_model #2019
Conversation
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D51431892 |
Summary: We want to use the GenerationNode equivalent of model which is fitted_model instead of the GenerationStep field model Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan Differential Revision: D51431892
Summary: We want to use the GenerationNode equivalent of model which is fitted_model instead of the GenerationStep field model Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan Differential Revision: D51431892
Summary: We want to use the GenerationNode equivalent of model which is fitted_model instead of the GenerationStep field model Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan Differential Revision: D51431892
Summary: We want to use the GenerationNode equivalent of model which is fitted_model instead of the GenerationStep field model Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan Differential Revision: D51431892
e2d9d27
to
a2e3664
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D51431892 |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2019 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.47% 94.47%
=======================================
Files 460 460
Lines 44335 44341 +6
=======================================
+ Hits 41885 41891 +6
Misses 2450 2450 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Summary: We want to use the GenerationNode equivalent of model which is fitted_model instead of the GenerationStep field model Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan Differential Revision: D51431892
Summary: We want to use the GenerationNode equivalent of model which is fitted_model instead of the GenerationStep field model Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan Differential Revision: D51431892
Summary: We want to use the GenerationNode equivalent of model which is fitted_model instead of the GenerationStep field model Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan Differential Revision: D51431892
a2e3664
to
fc7dca6
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D51431892 |
Summary: We want to use the GenerationNode equivalent of model which is fitted_model instead of the GenerationStep field model Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan Differential Revision: D51431892
Summary: We want to use the GenerationNode equivalent of model which is fitted_model instead of the GenerationStep field model Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan Differential Revision: D51431892
fc7dca6
to
6459a68
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D51431892 |
This pull request has been merged in 918c9c2. |
Summary: We want to use the GenerationNode equivalent of model which is fitted_model instead of the GenerationStep field model
Differential Revision: D51431892