Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump sundrio to 0.50.1 #3438

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2021
Merged

Conversation

iocanel
Copy link
Member

@iocanel iocanel commented Sep 2, 2021

The pull request bumps sundrio to 0.50.1.

Important things about this version upgrade:

  • Builder annotations no longer use:
    • Velocity
    • Apache Commons Lang
    • Github Java Parser
  • Transform no longer use:
    • Velocity

So velocity is now explicitly added as a shaded uberjar: io.sundr:sundr-codegen-velocity-nodeps.
A potential lighter alternative that uses String Template 4 is available at: io.sundr:sundr-codegen-st4-nodeps. So, we might consider converting at some point.

@centos-ci
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@iocanel iocanel requested a review from metacosm September 2, 2021 08:02
@iocanel iocanel force-pushed the sundrio-0.50.1 branch 2 times, most recently from 21d68b4 to ba8584f Compare September 2, 2021 08:22
Copy link
Collaborator

@metacosm metacosm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

pom.xml Outdated
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>

<!-- Core versions -->
<sundrio.version>0.40.1</sundrio.version>
<sundrio.version>0.50.0</sundrio.version>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this be 0.50.1, actually?

@@ -749,7 +755,7 @@
<groupId>io.sundr</groupId>
<artifactId>sundr-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${sundrio.version}</version>
<dependencies>
<!--dependencies>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to keep that code commented out? Can't we just remove it?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 3, 2021

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

58.3% 58.3% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@manusa manusa added this to the 5.7.3 milestone Sep 6, 2021
@manusa manusa requested a review from rohanKanojia September 6, 2021 09:14
@manusa manusa merged commit 9eb5fae into fabric8io:master Sep 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants