Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the need for KubernetesResourceMappingProvider #3923

Closed
shawkins opened this issue Mar 3, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #4511
Closed

Remove the need for KubernetesResourceMappingProvider #3923

shawkins opened this issue Mar 3, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #4511
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@shawkins
Copy link
Contributor

shawkins commented Mar 3, 2022

I think we can also do away with the need for KubernetesResourceMappingProvider - basically the same mechanism as what is registering handlers that is proposed by #3845 but via the ExtensionAdapter. All it needs to do is declare the packages of the models.

It all depends on the expectation of if the user can make use of KubernetesDesializer / Serialization independently of the client as that will complicate this simplification.

Originally posted by @shawkins in #3876 (comment)

@shawkins shawkins added this to the 6.x milestone Mar 11, 2022
@shawkins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Relates to #3993

shawkins added a commit to shawkins/kubernetes-client that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 26, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity since 90 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days. Thank you for your contributions!

@stale stale bot added the status/stale label Jun 26, 2022
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Jul 4, 2022
@manusa manusa reopened this Sep 1, 2022
shawkins added a commit to shawkins/kubernetes-client that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2022
shawkins added a commit to shawkins/kubernetes-client that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2022
shawkins added a commit to shawkins/kubernetes-client that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2022
shawkins added a commit to shawkins/kubernetes-client that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2022
shawkins added a commit to shawkins/kubernetes-client that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2022
shawkins added a commit to shawkins/kubernetes-client that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2022
shawkins added a commit to shawkins/kubernetes-client that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2022
@shawkins shawkins modified the milestones: 6.x, 6.3.0 Oct 20, 2022
shawkins added a commit to shawkins/kubernetes-client that referenced this issue Nov 14, 2022
shawkins added a commit to shawkins/kubernetes-client that referenced this issue Nov 14, 2022
shawkins added a commit to shawkins/kubernetes-client that referenced this issue Nov 14, 2022
shawkins added a commit to shawkins/kubernetes-client that referenced this issue Nov 14, 2022
shawkins added a commit to shawkins/kubernetes-client that referenced this issue Nov 16, 2022
manusa added a commit to manusa/quarkus that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2022
Since Fabric8 Kubernetes Client 6.3, types are no longer
automatically registered for deserialization.
For automatic type registration an
`META-INF/services/io.fabric8.kubernetes.api.model.KubernetesResource`
SPI definition file needs to be provided instead with the
Kubernetes Resources (Objects -HasMadata impls-) that need to be
automatically registered in the KubernetesDeserializer.

fabric8io/kubernetes-client#3923
Signed-off-by: Marc Nuri <[email protected]>
ebullient pushed a commit to maxandersen/quarkus that referenced this issue Jan 24, 2023
Since Fabric8 Kubernetes Client 6.3, types are no longer
automatically registered for deserialization.
For automatic type registration an
`META-INF/services/io.fabric8.kubernetes.api.model.KubernetesResource`
SPI definition file needs to be provided instead with the
Kubernetes Resources (Objects -HasMadata impls-) that need to be
automatically registered in the KubernetesDeserializer.

fabric8io/kubernetes-client#3923
Signed-off-by: Marc Nuri <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants