Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactoring location in response #5316

Conversation

vakhid-shagmanov
Copy link

No description provided.

@vakhid-shagmanov
Copy link
Author

@dougwilson

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for this. Normally we do not accept style only changes, but I'm not sure what the reason for this change in since none was provided. I also see the comment is lost too explaining the special case. Can you elaborate on what this change's purpose is so we can evaluate it?

@vakhid-shagmanov
Copy link
Author

It just seems to me that the design where we first assign the value of a variable is a little incorrect, then we look at its value and if it is equal to “back” we set something else. It seems to me that this could be done right away.

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor

Gorcha. I mean, it sounds like u are saying the style is not reallt to your liking, and I get that. We get a lot of comments on not liking some style over another, which is why we don't reallt take style-only changes, I am sorry. If you want to contribute a feature, you can code it in the style you like of course :)

@dougwilson dougwilson closed this Nov 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants