Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wordy: update to most recent canonical specification #530

Closed
wolf99 opened this issue Oct 15, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #580
Closed

wordy: update to most recent canonical specification #530

wolf99 opened this issue Oct 15, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #580
Assignees

Comments

@wolf99
Copy link
Contributor

wolf99 commented Oct 15, 2020

Recently a .meta/tests.toml file was introduced to each exercise on this track.
The purpose being to show how an exercise aligns (or does not align) to the exercise's canonical-data.json (in the problem-specifications repo), by comparing the UUID assigned to each test case.

See the canonical-data-syncer for how to check the exercises for this.

This has shown that the wordy exercise has missing or out of date tests.

The request for this issue is to assign the issue to yourself and then (having read our CONTIBUTING.md) update the exercise such that:

  • Existing test names are correct
  • Existing tests match the requirements of the related canonical-data.json
  • Missing tests are added
    • If needed, the example implementation is adjusted to fulfill the added test cases
  • Update the related tests.toml file to add the UUIDs that correspond to the updated tests

See the following past PR for an example #493

wolf99 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 25, 2021
@wolf99 wolf99 self-assigned this Jan 25, 2021
ryanplusplus added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 26, 2021
* wordy: align with specification per #530

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Ryan Hartlage <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant