This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2020. It is now read-only.
Simplify heading syntax #11
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
NelleV
reviewed
Sep 25, 2017
| - `^`, for subsubsections (maps to `<h4 class="subsubsection">`) | ||
| - `"`, for paragraphs (maps to `<h5 class="paragraph">`) | ||
| - `'`, for paragraphs (maps to `<h6 class="paragraph">`) | ||
| * Only ATX (#-style) headings are used. The different levels, `#` through `######`, map to `h1` through `h6`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are you suggesting to make this incompatible with rst?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not incompatible; just that RST would render title headings with {} as part of the text.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this should be fine, given that we will probably implemented Myst as a pre-processing step to RST.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The heading specification in this proposal still strikes me as still being quite complicated to memorize. We can consider the {} syntax for adding class attributes, as introduced by Markdown extra and outlined in this PR.
Note that Markdown Extra also allows the {} syntax proposed by Myst for extra image attributes (they also allow its use on links).