This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 30, 2022. It is now read-only.
Clarify fidesops meta tutorial/docs #184
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eastandwestwind
commented
Jan 27, 2022
| @@ -48,15 +48,6 @@ the user by `email`, and from there, travel through other tables linked to `user | |||
| identity: email | |||
| ``` | |||
|
|
|||
| Optional `fidesops_meta` fields: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since this is a tutorial (walks through implementing a specific dataset), my opinion is we should keep info re: accepted fields in 1 unified place in docs
pattisdr
approved these changes
Jan 27, 2022
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
Clarify tutorial/docs around fidesops_meta
Changes
fidesops_metainfo from tutorial such that the info lives in 1 place in the docsChecklist
Ticket
Unticketed