-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
eof: Add auxdataloadn
to reserved identifiers. Move test to eof
dir
#15529
Conversation
Thank you for your contribution to the Solidity compiler! A team member will follow up shortly. If you haven't read our contributing guidelines and our review checklist before, please do it now, this makes the reviewing process and accepting your contribution smoother. If you have any questions or need our help, feel free to post them in the PR or talk to us directly on the #solidity-dev channel on Matrix. |
5b54415
to
5eeb51a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems ok the way I see it here, but before we merge, please rebase on develop
. We merged #15520 today, which affected EVMDialect
implementation.
I see no conflicts, but I'd like to know if the shift introduced to handles by the EOF/non-EOF difference does not cause issues.
5eeb51a
to
2859989
Compare
2859989
to
5db362c
Compare
if (_eofVersion.has_value()) | ||
reserved += std::vector<std::string>{ | ||
"auxdataloadn", | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@clonker I think we should refactor this so that reserved identifiers automatically contain all builtin names from the current dialect. Then remove the ones that are exceptions. What do you think? It would make this kind of mistake harder to make.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, absolutely. In my mind it is more likely that we add new reserved builtins compared to the amount of times we would be adding more exceptions.
No description provided.